HELIPAQ CERECYTE CHE182030-30Recalls & reported problems
Medos International Sàrl · HELIPAQ microcoil HELIPAQ 18 CERECYTE Coil 20mm x 30cm 190cm Contents: 1 Detachable Coil System · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00878528000877), received between Nov 22, 2016 and Nov 22, 2016 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Deformation” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Deformation1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 22, 2016Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE HELIPAQ COIL 20 X 30 (CHE18203020/C39307) WAS IMPEDED IN THE COIL INTRODUCER AND THE COIL INTRODUCER WAS DAMAGED. AS REPORTED BY A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL COIL DID NOT NAVIGATE THROUGH THE MICROCATHETER (COMPETITOR¿S DEVICE) AND ALSO THE GREEN ZIPPER PIECE BROKE IN HALF AS THE COIL WAS BEING LOADED INTO MICROCATHETER. COIL WAS REMOVED AND A SECOND HELIPAQ 20 X 30 WAS PLACED WITHOUT ANY ISSUES USING THE SAME MICROCATHETER. THERE WERE NO DAMAGES NOTED ON THE MICROCATHETER PRIOR TO USE OR UPON REMOVAL. PATIENT WAS NOT INJURED AND THE REPORTED EVENT CAUSED A 10 MINUTE DELAY IN THE CASE. THE PATIENT¿S PRESENT CONDITION IS GOOD. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD LOW VESSEL TORTUOSITY AND HAD NORMAL TARGET LESION CHARACTERISTICS; TARGET VESSEL WAS THE HYPOGASTRIC ARTERY. FIVE (5) ADDITIONAL HELIPAQ COILS WERE IMPLANTED WITHOUT ISSUE. IT WAS INITIALLY REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6121857 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page