CERECYTE PRESIDIO PC4181447-30Recalls & reported problems
Medos International Sàrl · PRESIDIO microcoil PRESIDIO 18 CERECYTE Coil 14mm x 47cm 190cm Contents: 1 Detachable Coil System · Class 2 · Implant
All models of CERECYTE PRESIDIO (16)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00878528003267), received between Oct 7, 2016 and May 18, 2021 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Advance” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Advance2
- Unraveled Material1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 18, 2021Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance
AS REPORTED BY THE FIELD, DURING A COIL EMBOLIZATION, PRESIDIO 18 CERE COIL 14MMX47CM (PC418144730, L11951) BECAME IMPEDED. IT COULDN'T ADVANCE WITHIN THE UNSPECIFIED MICRO CATHETER (MC). NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. BASED ON THE ANALYSIS OF THE DEVICE RECEIVED, THE EMBOLIC COIL WAS FOUND STRETCHED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11842108 ↗MalfunctionOct 7, 2016Unraveled Material; Failure to Advance; Unraveled Material; Failure to Advance
THE CONTACT FROM THE FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING COIL EMBOLIZATION OF AN ANEURYSM (15MM IN SIZE) AT HEPATIC ARTERY TWO PRESIDIO COILS (PC4181550-30/C35982, PC4181447-30/C34163) AN ORBIT GALAXY COIL (640CF0721/17383916) WERE STUCK IN THE MICROCATHETER. THE ENPOWER CONTROL CABLE WAS NOT CLEAN UPON OPENING HOWEVER DID NOT PROVIDE ANY REASON. THE LOCATION THAT THE DEVICE WAS NOT CLEAN IS UNKNOWN HOWEVER THE ISSUE WAS NOT DISCOVERED DURING OPENING. THE PATIENT WAS A MALE OF UNKNOWN AGE; THE LEVEL OF TORTUOUSITY WAS HEAVY, AND NO CALCIFICATION OF THE VESSELS. A SHEATH INTRODUCER (TERUMO), A GUIDEWIRE (ASAHI), A PROGREAT MICROCATHETER (TERUMO), A LIGHTHOUSE (PIOLAX), AND A Y CONNECTOR (TERUMO) WERE USED FOR THIS PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT PRESIDIO COILS WERE THE FIRST TWO COILS USED IN THE PROCEDURE. THE FIRST COIL WAS STUCK AT THE DISTAL AREA IN THE MICROCATHETER (MC), AND IT WAS RETRIEVED. THE RESISTANCE WAS STRONG WHILE RETRIEVING AS WELL. THE SECOND COIL WAS STUCK IN THE MIDDLE OF MC DURING MC PLACEMENT. IT DIDNMOVE AT ALL AND RETRIEVED WHEN THE MC WAS RETRIEVED. THEN MC WAS REPLACED AND THE PROCEDURE CONTINUED. THE COMPLAINT GALAXY WAS USED AFTER THE PHYSICIAN INSERTED MORE T
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6011644 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page