MICRUSPHERE SPH100600-20Recalls & reported problems
Medos International Sàrl · MICRUSPHERE microcoil MICRUSPHERE 10 Platinum Coil 6mm x 11.9cm 190cm Contents: 1 Detachable Coil System · Class 2 · Implant
All models of MICRUSPHERE (22)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00878528003564), received between Oct 17, 2017 and Jul 23, 2018 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Stretched” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Stretched3
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 23, 2018Stretched; Stretched
THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE MICROSPHERE 10 PLATINUM COIL 6MM X 11.9CM (B)(4) WAS FOUND STRETCHED. THE COIL WAS WITHDRAWN AND ANOTHER COIL WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ANY PATIENT INJURY OR CONSEQUENCE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7712910 ↗MalfunctionMar 13, 2018Stretched; Stretched
IT WAS REPORTED BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL THAT A MICRUSPHERE 6MM X 11.0CM COIL (SPH10060020/C27844) HAD STRETCHED DURING AN ANEURYSM COILING PROCEDURE. THE PHYSICIAN ADVANCED THE COIL WITHOUT ANY ISSUES, BUT REALIZED IT WAS TOO BIG FOR THE ANEURYSM AND REMOVED IT. WHEN THE COIL WAS REMOVED, THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED THAT PART OF THE COIL WAS STRETCHED AT THE PROXIMAL PORTION. THE PATIENT'S OUTCOME WAS FINE AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THE PATIENT'S VESSEL CHARACTERISTICS WERE STANDARD. THERE WAS NO DELAY IN PROCEDURE AS A RESULT OF THE REPORTED EVENT AND NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED TO THE PATIENT. A SCEPTER BALLOON CATHETER XC, 7F 10CM TERUMO SHEATH, 6F ENVOY MPD 100CM, PROWLER SL10, HEADLINER GUIDEWIRE .012, AND A SYNCHRO STANDARD WIRE .014 WERE ALSO USED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO THE COIL, COIL DELIVERY SYSTEM, OR COIL DETACHMENT SYSTEM PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE. THE COIL WAS STILL ATTACHED TO THE DELIVERY SYSTEM WHEN IT WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THERE WERE NO KINKS OR BENDS NOTED TO THE MICROCATHETER THAT MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED EVENT. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE SCEPTER BALLOON CATHETER XC MAY HAVE HAD A LEAK AS IT WAS N
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7333969 ↗MalfunctionOct 17, 2017Stretched; Stretched
IT WAS REPORTED BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL THAT A MICRUSPHERE COIL (SPH10060020/C22165) STRETCHED DURING A PROCEDURE. ANOTHER ONE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6954281 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page