DELTAPAQ CERECYTE CDF100254-30Recalls & reported problems
Medos International Sàrl · DELTAPAQ microcoil DELTAPAQ 10 CERECYTE Coil 2.5mm x 4cm 190cm Contents: 1 Detachable Coil System · Class 2 · Implant
All models of DELTAPAQ CERECYTE (20)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00878528007135), received between Aug 29, 2016 and Nov 18, 2016 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Positioning Failure” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Positioning Failure1
- Unintended Movement1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 18, 2016Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement
AS REPORTED VIA A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, APPROXIMATELY THREE MONTHS AFTER PLACEMENT OF A PULSERIDER DEVICE (CATALOG 203E/W2485) FOR TREATMENT OF A 3.77CM NECK WIDTH GIANT BASILAR ARTERY ANEURYSM, FOLLOW-UP IMAGES REVEALED A SIGNIFICANT DISLOCATION OF THE PULSERIDER IN THE PROXIMAL DIRECTION. THE COIL PACKAGE WAS ALSO DISLOCATED AND SOME LOOPS OF ONE DELTAPAQ COIL (CDF 10025430/C39436) WAS LOCATED IN THE PARENT VESSEL. THE PULSERIDER HAD BEEN PREPPED AND USED AS PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THE DEVICE HAD BEEN INSPECTED PRIOR TO USE AND APPEARED NORMAL PRIOR TO USE. THERE HAD BEEN NO ISSUES WHEN THE DEVICE WAS FIRST IMPLANTED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANTATION WAS VERY EASY AND CORRECTLY PLACED. THE ANGLES OF THE BRANCH ARTERIES WERE ABOUT 90 DEGREES. THE DEVICE HAD NOT BEEN RETRIEVED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE COIL HAD PROTRUDED APPROXIMATELY 1.5CM INTO THE PARENT VESSEL, BUT DID NOT RESULT IN BLOOD FLOW OBSTRUCTION. THE ANEURYSM REMAINED PARTIALLY OCCLUDED WITH COILS, AND THERE WAS NO EFFORT TO PUSH THE COIL BACK INTO THE ANEURYSM. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS DOING VERY WELL AND NO ADDITIONAL INTERVENTIONS WERE PLANNED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6113507 ↗MalfunctionAug 29, 2016Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
AS REPORTED BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, 5 DELTAPAQ COILS (CDF10015230/ C37792, CDF10025430/ C36045, CDF10020430/ C36101, CDF10020330/ C40094 AND CDF10030630/ C37174) FAILED TO DETACH. THE DETACHMENT CABLE AND DCB WERE CHANGED, BUT THE COILS COULD NOT BE DETACHED. ALL OF THE COILS WERE USED IN THE SAME CASE, BUT NOT USED CONSECUTIVELY. THERE WERE NO POTENTIAL PATIENT ADVERSE EVENTS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRODUCT WOULD BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 5910142 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page