DELTAPAQ CERECYTE CDF100510-30Recalls & reported problems
Medos International Sàrl · DELTAPAQ microcoil DELTAPAQ 10 CERECYTE Coil 5mm x 10cm 190cm Contents: 1 Detachable Coil System · Class 2 · Implant
All models of DELTAPAQ CERECYTE (20)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00878528007296), received between May 10, 2017 and Jan 26, 2021 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Stretched” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Stretched2
- Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 26, 2021Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Material Split, Cut or Torn
THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT THE 5MM X 10CM DELTAPAQ 10 CERECYTE COIL (CDF10051030 / S10533) FAILED TO BE RESHEATHED AFTER THE ATTEMPT TO TRY AND CHANGE THE COIL DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE INTRODUCER SPLIT. ADEQUATE AND CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS MAINTAINED THROUGH THE CONCOMITANT EXCELSIOR® SL-10® MICROCATHETER (STRYKER). THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE AT ANY TIME WHEN THE COIL WAS BEING ADVANCED THROUGH THE MICROCATHETER. THERE WAS NO ISSUE WITH THE MICROCATHETER. PRIOR TO THIS ISSUE, THERE WERE OTHER COILS THAT WENT THROUGH THE SAME MICROCATHETER. THERE WAS A ONE-TO-ONE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE COIL AND DELIVERY SYSTEM, AND IT WAS VERIFIED WITH FLUOROSCOPY PRIOR TO COIL REPOSITIONING. THE MICROCATHETER WAS NOT REPOSITIONED OVER THE COIL WHILE THE COIL WAS DEPLOYED / PARTIALLY DEPLOYED FROM THE DISTAL END OF THE MICROCATHETER. THE COIL WAS NOT POSITIONED AT A RELATIVELY SHARP ANGLE TO THE MICROCATHETER. THE EVENT ALSO EMPLOYED THE USE OF A STENT (UNKNOWN BRAND). THERE WAS NO BLOOD FLOW REDUCTION / RESTRICTION DUE TO THE REPORTED ISSUE WITH THE FAILED RESHEATHING. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ANY PATIENT ADVERSE EVENT OR COMPLICATION. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. DUR
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11233990 ↗MalfunctionAug 8, 2019Stretched; Stretched
AS REPORTED BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, DURING A COIL EMBOLIZATION, A 2.5MMX6CM DELTAPAQ CERE (CDF10025630, LOT UNKNOWN), A 3MMX6CM DELTAPAQ CERECYTE (CDF10030630, LOT UNKNOWN) AND A 5MMX10CM DELTAPAQ CERE (CDF10051030, S11295) WERE NOT ABLE TO ADVANCE NOR RETRIEVED BY THE PHYSICIAN. THE PHYSICIAN PULLED THE COILS AND MICROCATHETER (MC) AT THE SAME TIME. AFTER INSPECTION IT TURNS OUT TO BE STRETCHED. THE PHYSICIAN USED A SAME LIKE PRODUCT. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY FINISHED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8874318 ↗MalfunctionMay 10, 2017Stretched; Stretched
AS REPORTED BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, AN ENVOY DA CATHETER (67125805D/ E11363) WAS KINKED WHEN IT WAS FIRST OPENED, A DELTAPAQ INTRODUCER (CDF10051030/ C38958) FAILED TO RE-ZIP DURING RE-SHEATHING AND WAS FOUND TO BE STRETCHED DURING PRODUCT ANALYSIS, AND THERE WAS RESISTANCE DURING ADVANCEMENT OF A PRESIDIO COIL (PC410073030/ C37141) THROUGH THE UNSPECIFIED MICROCATHETER AND THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED WITH THE COIL PREMATURELY DETACHED. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT LIKE THE SHAPE OF COIL DEPLOYMENT AND DECIDED TO PULL IT OUT, BUT DURING RE-SHEATHING THE COIL INTRODUCER FAILED TO RE-ZIP. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH SAME/LIKE PRODUCTS. THERE WERE NO POTENTIAL ADVERSE EVENTS. AFTER MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6556765 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page