DELTAPLUSH DPL100202-20Recalls & reported problems
Medos International Sàrl · DELTAPLUSH microcoil DELTAPLUSH 10 Stretch Resistant Coil 2mm x 2cm 190cm Contents: 1 Detachable Coil System · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00878528008040), received between Feb 6, 2018 and Jun 5, 2019 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Entrapment of Device” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Entrapment of Device1
- Material Deformation1
- Positioning Failure1
- Stretched1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 5, 2019Entrapment of Device; Stretched; Material Deformation; Entrapment of Device; Stretched; Material Deformation
THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING THE STENT-ASSISTED COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE TARGETING THE ANEURYSM ON THE TERMINAL INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA), THE 2MM X 2CM DELTAPLUSH 10 COIL (DPL10020220 / S10016) DELIVERED THROUGH THE SL-10® MICROCATHETER (STRYKER) WAS REPORTED TO BE STIFF; THE STIFFNESS CAUSED THE COIL TO PUSH A LOOP OF A PREVIOUSLY PLACED 3MM X 5.4CM MICRUSFRAME 10 COIL (MFR100305 / UNK LOT) INTO THE PARENT VESSEL. AS A RESULT, A NEUROFORM ATLAS® STENT SYSTEM (STRYKER) WAS SUBSEQUENTLY PLACED TO SECURE THE COIL TO THE PARENT VESSEL WALL. A 2 MM X 2 CM BARRICADE¿ HELICAL COIL (BLOCKADE MEDICAL) WAS USED TO REPLACE THE DELTAPLUSH COIL AFTER THE STENT PLACEMENT WITHOUT INCIDENT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT CONTINUOUS FLUSH HAD BEEN MAINTAINED THROUGH THE MICROCATHETER; THE DELTAPLUSH COIL HAD BEEN REPOSITIONED ONCE. THE DELTAPLUSH COIL WAS REMOVED THROUGH THE MICROCATHETER UNDETACHED AND WITHOUT ANY OBSERVABLE DAMAGE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT ADVERSE EVENT OR COMPLICATION AS A RESULT OF THE REPORTED EVENT. THE PRODUCT WILL BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8670593 ↗MalfunctionFeb 6, 2018Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
AS REPORTED BY AN AFFILIATE, DURING A COIL EMBOLIZATION OF AN UNKNOWN SITE, THE DELTAPLUSH COIL (DPL10020220, UNKNOWN LOT NUMBER), WAS IN THE MICROCATHETER (MC) AND POSITIONED IN THE PATIENT, HOWEVER, IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE FOR THE DOCTOR TO DETACH THE COIL. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED. IT¿S UNKNOWN OF THE DEVICE IS AVAILABLE FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7244909 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page