DELTAPLUSH CERECYTE CPL100206-30Recalls & reported problems
Medos International Sàrl · DELTAPLUSH microcoil DELTAPLUSH 10 CERECYTE Coil 2mm x 6cm 190cm Contents: 1 Detachable Coil System · Class 2 · Implant
All models of DELTAPLUSH CERECYTE (12)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00878528008231), received between Nov 9, 2016 and Aug 4, 2022 — classified as 7 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Advance” (2 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K083646); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Advance2
- Stretched2
- Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
- Material Twisted/Bent1
- Physical Resistance1
- Positioning Failure1
- Separation Failure1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient5
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 4, 2022Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance
THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN ENDOVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN FILLED THE TARGET ANEURYSM WITH THE FIRST COIL, A 2MM X 6CM DELTAPLUSH 10 CERECYTE COIL (CPL10020630 / S14489) AND OBSERVED THAT IT WAS IMPEDED IN THE INTRODUCER. THE PHYSICIAN ADJUSTED THE COIL AND PUSHED IT OUT FROM THE INTRODUCER, HOWEVER, THE COIL WAS FOUND TO HAVE UNRAVELED / STRETCHED. THE PHYSICIAN USED THE SECOND COIL, ANOTHER 2MM X 6CM DELTAPLUSH 10 CERECYTE COIL (CPL10020630 / S14489), BUT IT WAS ALSO IMPEDED IN THE INTRODUCER AND COULD NOT BE PUSHED. A THIRD COIL, A 1.5MM X 6CM DELTAPAQ 10 CERECYTE COIL (CDF10015630 / 30429053) WAS USED BUT THIS COIL ALSO WAS IMPEDED IN THE INTRODUCER AND COULD NOT BE PUSHED OUT. NEW DEVICES WERE USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ANY PATIENT ADVERSE EVENT OR COMPLICATION. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS. BASED ON THE RESULT OF THE PRODUCT ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON 04-AUG-2022, THE EVENT HAS BEEN DEEMED REPORTABLE AS A ¿MALFUNCTION.¿
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15170605 ↗MalfunctionMay 4, 2022Stretched; Failure to Advance; Stretched; Failure to Advance
THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN ENDOVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN FILLED THE TARGET ANEURYSM WITH THE FIRST COIL, A 2MM X 6CM DELTAPLUSH 10 CERECYTE COIL (CPL10020630 / S14489) AND OBSERVED THAT IT WAS IMPEDED IN THE INTRODUCER. THE PHYSICIAN ADJUSTED THE COIL AND PUSHED IT OUT FROM THE INTRODUCER, HOWEVER, THE COIL WAS FOUND TO HAVE UNRAVELED / STRETCHED. THE PHYSICIAN USED THE SECOND COIL, ANOTHER 2MM X 6CM DELTAPLUSH 10 CERECYTE COIL (CPL10020630 / S14489), BUT IT WAS ALSO IMPEDED IN THE INTRODUCER AND COULD NOT BE PUSHED. A THIRD COIL, A 1.5MM X 6CM DELTAPAQ 10 CERECYTE COIL (CDF10015630 / 30429053) WAS USED BUT THIS COIL ALSO WAS IMPEDED IN THE INTRODUCER AND COULD NOT BE PUSHED OUT. NEW DEVICES WERE USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ANY PATIENT ADVERSE EVENT OR COMPLICATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14274668 ↗MalfunctionJan 14, 2019Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent
A REPORT WAS RECEIVED THAT DURING A COIL EMBOLIZATION, THE 2MM X 4CM DELTAPLUSH 10 (CPL10020430/C24954) AND 2MM X 6CM DELTAPLUSH 10 (CPL10020630/L10055) COILS WERE NOTED TO BE KINKED AND COULD NOT BE DEPLOYED/INSERTED INTO THE EMBOLIZATION. THE COILS WERE REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. IT WAS NOT REPORTED IF THE COILS WERE REMOVED WITHOUT THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION. THE SURGERY WAS NOT DELAYED DUE TO THE EVENT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF CONSEQUENCE OF IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. THE PRODUCTS WILL BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8245813 ↗MalfunctionJul 23, 2018Separation Failure; Separation Failure
THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DELTAPLUSH 10 CERECYTE COIL 2MM X 6CM ((B)(4)) COULD NOT BE DETACHED. THE COIL WAS WITHDRAWN AND ANOTHER COIL WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ANY PATIENT INJURY OR CONSEQUENCE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7712615 ↗MalfunctionOct 17, 2017Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
IT WAS REPORTED BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL THAT A DELTAPLUSH COIL (CPL10020630/C26421) COULD NOT BE DETACHED DURING A PROCEDURE. ANOTHER ONE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6954355 ↗MalfunctionMar 13, 2017Physical Resistance; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Physical Resistance; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress
AS REPORTED BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, DURING COIL EMBOLIZATION OF A 4.7MM X 5.5MM LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY ANEURYSM, THE DELTAPLUSH COIL (CPL10020630/ C35990) COULD NOT EXIT THE INTRODUCER, AND DURING PRODUCT ANALYSIS, IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE PROXIMAL END OF THE COIL HAD SEVERE COMPRESSION AND BUCKLING DAMAGE. THEY USED A NEW COIL TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE DEVICE HAD BEEN PREPPED AS PER THE IFU. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT INJURY OR PROCEDURE DELAY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6399026 ↗MalfunctionNov 9, 2016Stretched; Stretched
AS REPORTED BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, DURING A PROCEDURE PRIOR TO BEING USED ON THE PATIENT A KINK WAS FOUND ON THE INTRODUCER OF A DELTAPLUSH CERECYTE COIL 2MM X 6 CM (CPL10020630/C35465). PATIENT INFORMATION AND PROCEDURE DETAILS ARE UNKNOWN. THERE WAS ONLY A MINOR DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE AND THERE WERE NO INTRA OR POST PROCEDURAL COMPLICATIONS RELATED TO DEVICE OR THE REPORTED EVENT. IT WAS INITIALLY REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6089085 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K083646. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0845-2011 · Oct 21, 2010 · TerminatedMicrus Endovascular Microcoil Delivery System; The Micrus Microcoil Delivery System consists of three components, a Microcoil System, a Connecting Cable, and a Detachment Control B
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page