MICRUSPHERE SSR181540-20Recalls & reported problems
Medos International Sàrl · MICRUSPHERE XL microcoil MICRUSPHERE XL 18 Stretch Resistant Coil 15mm x 40cm 190cm Contents: 1 Detachable Coil System · Class 2 · Implant
All models of MICRUSPHERE (22)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00878528009986), received between Dec 21, 2016 and May 16, 2022 — classified as 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment Of Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment Of Device Component1
- Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
- Failure to Advance1
- Physical Resistance1
- Premature Activation1
- Stretched1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 16, 2022Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance
AS REPORTED BY THE FIELD, DURING AN ENDOVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE ON A MALE PATIENT, THE MICROSPHERE XL 15MM X 40CM COIL (SSR18154020, L14750) PRESENTED TECHNICAL PROBLEMS AND THERE WAS NO PROGRESSION WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER, MAKING ITS USE IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE TREATMENT OF THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. BASED ON THE ANALYSIS OF THE DEVICE RECEIVED, THE EMBOLIC COIL WAS FOUND STRETCHED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14408476 ↗MalfunctionAug 8, 2018Stretched; Stretched
AS REPORTED BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, DURING A COIL EMBOLIZATION OF AN ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY ANEURYSM, STRONG RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED WHILE INSERTING THE 15 MM X 40 CM MICRUSPHERE XL (SSR18154020/S12632) THERMO-MECHANICAL COIL INTO THE PROWLER LPES MICROCATHETER (UNK CATALOG AND LOT) AND THE EMBOLIC COIL STRETCHED PRIOR TO DEPLOYMENT. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS OCCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT. THE MICRUSPHERE COIL WILL BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. IT WAS NOT REPORTED WHETHER THE PROWLER MICROCATHETER WOULD BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7763745 ↗MalfunctionMar 10, 2017Premature Activation; Physical Resistance; Premature Activation; Physical Resistance
AS REPORTED BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, A MICRUSPHERE XL COIL (SSR18154020/ P10990) COULD NOT BE PUSHED INTO THE UNSPECIFIED MICROCATHETER. INFORMATION FROM THE PRODUCT ANALYSIS ON 3/2/2017 REVEALED THAT THE COIL WAS MECHANICALLY DETACHED FROM THE DEVICE POSITION UNIT (DPU).
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6394848 ↗MalfunctionDec 21, 2016Detachment Of Device Component; Device Operates Differently Than Expected; Detachment Of Device Component; Device Operates Differently Than Expected
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CONTACT AT THE USER FACILITY THAT DURING A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE THE FIRST COIL USED A MICRUSPHERE XL 15MM X 40 CM ((B)(4)) COIL COULD NOT BE DETECTED BY THE DETACHMENT BOX. THE GREEN LED LIGHT DID NOT ILLUMINATE WHEN THE CONNECTING CABLE WAS CONNECTED TO THE HUB OF THE COIL. ALL THE CONNECTIONS WERE CHECKED AFTER WHICH THE CONNECTING CABLE WAS CHANGED, HOWEVER THE LIGHT STILL DID NOT ILLUMINATE. A PRE-DEPLOYMENT ELECTRICAL CHECK WAS NOT PERFORMED WITH THE COMPLAINT COIL. THE COMPLAINT COIL WAS REMOVED AND WAS STILL ATTACHED TO THE DELIVERY SYSTEM; NO DAMAGES WERE NOTED ON THE COMPLAINT COIL. A NEW COIL WAS USED INSTEAD. THREE COILS WERE THEN USED WITHOUT ISSUES. PRE-DEPLOYMENT ELECTRICAL CHECK WAS PERFORMED WITH ALL THE COILS USED AFTER THE COMPLAINT COIL. THE SAME CONNECTING CABLE AND DETACHMENT CONTROL BOX WAS USED WITH THE SUBSEQUENT COILS. THERE WERE NO INTRA OR POST PROCEDURAL COMPLICATIONS OR SURGICAL DELAYS RELATED TO DEVICE OR REPORTED EVENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COIL EMBOLIZATION OF A PARTIALLY THROMBOSED GIANT TOP INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY ANEURYSM IN A (B)(6) YEAR OLD FEMALE PATIENT WHOSE VESSELS WERE SEVERELY TORTUOUS. IT WAS INITIALLY REPORTED
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6192658 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page