Skip to content

AMS 700 CXR RTE Kit 72403872Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Rear Tip Extenders for AMS 700 CXR Cylinders, 2 each of Non-Stackable 0.5, 1, 2, 3 cm RTEs and Stackable 1.5 cm RTEs · Class 3 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00878953002408), received between Apr 2, 2020 and Aug 31, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size2
  • Inflation Problem1
  • Malposition of Device1
  • Mechanical Problem1

Patient problems

  • Deformity/ Disfigurement1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 31, 2026Inflation Problem; Mechanical Problem; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Malposition of Device

    It was reported that a patient underwent an Inflatable Penile Prosthesis (IPP) revision surgery because the device was not functioning. No patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50533587 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 2, 2020Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SURGICAL PROCEDURE THE PHYSICIAN WITHDREW THE EXTENSION BODY(REAR TIP EXTENDER) RTE DUE TO A MEASUREMENT ISSUE. THE DEVICE WAS FOUND THAT THE TWO SIDES WERE NOT THE SAME LENGTH, SO THE PHYSICIAN WITHDREW THE EXTENSION BODY. A PATIENT OUTCOME OF STABLE WAS REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO INSERT THE CYLINDER AT ONE SIDE. A 16CM CYLINDER AND A 1CM RTE REMAIN IMPLANTED. THE DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT DURING INSTALLATION OF THE RTE, IT WAS FOUND THAT ONE SIDE OF THE PENIS WAS BENT, CAUSING ASYMMETRY BETWEEN THE TWO SIDES. AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS, THE RESULT WAS NOT SATISFACTORY, AND THE PENIS WAS FINALLY REMOVED.

    Patient problems: Deformity/ Disfigurement; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9918944 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Penis, Inflatable devices

All Prosthesis, Penis, Inflatable devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page