Skip to content

AMS 700 CX 72404172Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Inflatable Penile Prosthesis, 2 Cylinders, InhibiZone treated · Class 3 · Implant

All models of AMS 700 CX (6)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00878953003269), received between Dec 7, 2018 and Oct 24, 2024 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Defective Device” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
  • Defective Device1
  • Fluid/Blood Leak1
  • Inflation Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Perforation1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 24, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS (IPP) REVISION SURGERY DUE TO UNSPECIFIED REASONS; HOWEVER, UPON ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED COMPONENTS, A WEAR AT FOLD IN THE PROXIMAL END AND MIDDLE OF THE FIRST CYLINDER WAS IDENTIFIED, AND IN ADDITION, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE KINK RESISTANT TUBING (KRT) OF THE PUMP WERE WORN TO THE FILAMENT, AND ALSO THE PUMP DID NOT PASS THE VALVE ACTIVATE STATE TEST. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20526120 ↗
  • InjuryJun 28, 2023Fluid/Blood Leak; Inflation Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Fluid/Blood Leak; Inflation Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED INFLATION ISSUES WITH AN INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS (IPP) LEADING TO A REPLACEMENT SURGERY. DURING THE PROCEDURE, FLUID LOSS WAS NOTED; HOWEVER, ITS SOURCE WAS NOT DETECTED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17221380 ↗
  • InjuryMay 10, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS (IPP) BREACHED THE CAVERNOUS WALL OF THE PATIENT. IT WAS DETAILED THAT THE IMPLANT IS STILL WORKING PROPERLY, AND A REVISION SURGERY HAS NOT BEEN SCHEDULED YET. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Perforation

    MAUDE report 16908388 ↗
  • InjuryJan 20, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH AN INFECTION OF HIS INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS (IPP). THEREFORE, THE IPP WAS EXPLANTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 16218746 ↗
  • InjuryDec 7, 2018Defective Device; Defective Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS (IPP) WAS REVISED DUE TO PATIENT DISSATISFACTION OF NOT STIFF ENOUGH. THE CYLINDER WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED IN RELATION TO THIS EVENT. FURTHER INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED AND IS NOT YET AVAILABLE. SHOULD ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BECOME AVAILABLE, THIS COMPLAINT WILL BE REASSESSED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8144649 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Penis, Inflatable devices

All Prosthesis, Penis, Inflatable devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page