Skip to content

Arcos Modular Revision Hip System 11-301321Recalls & reported problems

Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Arcos Modular Revision Hip System (71)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00880304474314), received between Mar 15, 2022 and Oct 12, 2025 — classified as 7 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 2 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jun 2, 2021Class IITerminated

    Arcos Proximal Cone Bodies could potentially exhibit chatter in the inner taper fretting corrosion and device failure in vivo leading to surgical intervention

    Z-2267-2021 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Fracture2
  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information4
  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture1
  • Scar Tissue1
  • Unequal Limb Length1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 12, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A HIP PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INACCURATE LEG LENGTH. THE CONE BODY, STEM AND HEAD WERE REVISED. NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.

    Patient problems: Unequal Limb Length

    MAUDE report 23275520 ↗
  • InjuryJul 7, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A HIP PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION DUE TO A FRACTURED STEM. THE NECK WAS RETURNED AND WAS ALSO NOTED TO BE FRACTURED. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE, AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 22410730 ↗
  • InjuryApr 1, 2024Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD A HIP REVISION DUE TO A RIGHT BROKEN STEM IMPLANT. THERE WERE NO SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS. THOUGH REQUESTED, NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19010939 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 26, 2024Migration; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL TOTAL LEFT HIP ARTHROPLASTY PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE WITH UNKNOWN IMPLANTS. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO FEMORAL PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE ASSOCIATED WITH LOOSENING STEM. THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH ZIMMER BIOMET DEVICES DURING THE REVISION SURGERY AND WAS REVISED FOR A SECOND TIME THREE YEARS POST IMPLANTATION FOR IMPLANT SUBSIDENCE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18779327 ↗
  • InjuryNov 6, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    NO FURTHER INFORMATION AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18073427 ↗
  • InjuryNov 6, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED FOR A SECOND TIME APPROXIMATELY 13 YEARS LATER DUE TO METAL RELATED PATHOLOGY. AN EXTENDED TROCHANTERIC OSTEOTOMY WAS REQUIRED TO REMOVE THE WELL-FIXED STEM WHICH ALSO RESULTED IN FEMORAL FRACTURE REQUIRING AN OPEN REDUCTION INTERNAL FIXATION TO FIXATE THE GREATER TROCHANTER TO THE FEMUR.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture; Scar Tissue

    MAUDE report 18072699 ↗
  • InjuryMar 15, 2022Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO UNDERSIZED IMPLANT, LOOSENING, AND INFECTION APPROXIMATELY 3 YEARS POST IMPLANTATION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE REPORTED EVENT IS UNAVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 13774594 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, ELBOW, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, ELBOW, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page