Skip to content

Merit MAK™ 00884450008812Recalls & reported problems

Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 2

All models of Merit MAK (12)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884450008812), received between Dec 20, 2019 and Nov 26, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Separation4
  • Fracture3
  • Material Integrity Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
  • Foreign Body In Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 26, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING AN ADDITIONAL ATTEMPTED ACCESS WITH A 4F MAK KIT, THE ACCESS WIRE STARTED TO UNRAVEL WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE ACCESS WIRE WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED WITHOUT MEDICAL INTERVENTION. ANOTHER WIRE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THIS PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20784758 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 22, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING ATTEMPTED ACCESS WITH A 4F MAK KIT, THE ACCESS WIRE STARTED TO UNRAVEL WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE ACCESS WIRE WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED WITHOUT MEDICAL INTERVENTION. ANOTHER WIRE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THIS PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20511170 ↗
  • InjurySep 4, 2023Fracture; Material Integrity Problem; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT THE CATHETER WAS INSERTED AND THE ACCESS GUIDEWIRE STARTED TO UNRAVEL DURING A PROCEDURE ON A PEDIATRIC PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17680509 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 12, 2020Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT PART OF THE SHEATH TUBING WAS BROKE OFF IN THE PATIENT'S BODY DURING AVF PROCEDURE. BROKEN PART WAS RETRIEVED SUCCESSFULLY. NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 10398855 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 20, 2019Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO ACQUIRE VENOUS ACCESS VIA SELDINGER TECHNIQUE VIA ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE. RESISTANCE WAS FELT AS THE ACCESS WIRE WAS WITHDRAWN FROM THE ACCESS NEEDLE. WHEN THE WIRE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT, IT WAS NOTED BY THE CLINICIAN THAT 2CM OF THE ACCESS WIRE HAD DETACHED WITHIN SOFT TISSUE JUST POSTERIOR TO THE PATIENT'S FEMORAL VEIN. NO ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO RETRIEVE THE WIRE TIP, AS CT SCANS VERIFY THAT THE WIRE TIP IS NOT WITHIN THE PATIENT'S VEIN AND WILL NOT MIGRATE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 9501035 ↗

Other DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION devices

All DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page