Skip to content

Impress® 00884450009215Recalls & reported problems

Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 2

All models of Impress (145)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884450009215), received between Jan 7, 2022 and Feb 27, 2024 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 2 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture5
  • Material Separation4
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Material Fragmentation1
  • No Apparent Adverse Event1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient4
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 27, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; No Apparent Adverse Event; Detachment of Device or Device Component; No Apparent Adverse Event

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT WHEN ATTEMPTING A RENAL ANGIOGRAPHY AFTER SUCCESSFUL CANNULATION OF THE RENAL OSTIUM THEY WERE MANIPULATING/TORQUING AND POSITIONING THE CATHETER FOR A CONTRAST INJECTION. DURING THE CONTRAST HAND INJECTION, THE CATHETER TIP STARTED TO DETACH. THE ACCOUNT WAS ABLE TO REWIRE THE CATHETER WITH A GUIDEWIRE SO THAT THE GUIDEWIRE AND CATHETER TIP WERE SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED FROM THIS PATIENT AS A UNIT. AFTER CATHETER REMOVAL EX-VIVO, THEY CONTINUED TO MANIPULATE THE CATHETER AGAIN CHECKING FOR CATHETER FLEXIBILITY WHEN THE TIP FRACTURED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18793948 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 27, 2024Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A TIPS PROCEDURE VIA RADIAL ACCESS THROUGH THE CELIAC ARTERY, THE CATHETER TIP DETACHED WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN HAD ACQUIRED RETROGRADE ARTERIAL RADIAL ACCESS AND DURING CATHETER MANIPULATIONS, THE TIP FRAGMENTED WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO SNARE THE FRAGMENTS FROM THE PATIENT WITH A VASCULAR SNARE DEVICE, BUT THE TARGETED FOREIGN BODY FRAGMENTED AGAIN AFTER CAPTURE WITHIN THE PATIENT'S VASCULATURE SYSTEM.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 18793947 ↗
  • InjurySep 13, 2023Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING AN ILIAC VENOGRAPHY, THE TIP OF THE CATHETER CRACKED INTO PIECES DURING THE PASSAGE TO THE COMMON ILIAC ARTERY. SOME OF THE PIECES WERE REMAIN WITHIN THE PATIENT BODY. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 17736117 ↗
  • InjuryAug 17, 2022Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A NEUROIMAGING PROCEDURE, FOLLOWING AN ILIAC ARTERY ANGIOGRAPHY, THE TIP OF THE CATHETER CRACKED AND DETACHED. SEVERAL ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVE THE DETACHED PIECE. DURING THE ATTEMPTS, THE PIECE FRACTURED INTO TWO SEPARATE PIECES. ONE OF THE FRACTURED PIECES WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED. THE OTHER REMAINING PIECE IS STILL WITHIN THE PATIENT'S LOWER LIMB ARTERY AND WILL REQUIRE AN ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE FOR REMOVAL. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 15246763 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 15, 2022Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING USE OF THE CATHETER IN THE RBI, THE CATHETER BROKE IN THE VESSEL AND COULD NOT BE REMOVED. THE REMNANTS OF THE DEVICE WERE LEFT WITHIN A STENT GRAFT.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 13536823 ↗
  • InjuryJan 7, 2022Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE CATHETER TIP DETACHED WITHIN THE VESSEL OF THE PATIENT. THE FOREIGN BODY WAS SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT THROUGH OPEN SURGERY. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13197882 ↗

Other CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices

All CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page