Skip to content

Merit MAK™ 00884450011454Recalls & reported problems

Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 2

All models of Merit MAK (12)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884450011454), received between Jun 25, 2024 and Dec 4, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture2
  • Material Separation2

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 4, 2025Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A FEMORAL ANGIOGRAM PROCEDURE THE DEVICE SEPARATED FROM THE HUB. WHEN THE PROVIDER TWISTED THE SYRINGE ONTO THE HUB OF THE MICROPUNCTURE SHEATH, IT DETACHED FROM THE SHEATH AND LEFT THE SHAFT INSIDE THE VESSEL. THE PATIENT HAD TO BE TAKEN TO VASCULAR SURGERY FOR SHEATH REMOVAL.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 23720198 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 25, 2024Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT THE TIP OF AN ACCESS WIRE DISLODGED WITHIN A PATIENTS VESSEL DURING ACCESS FOR HD CATHETER PLACEMENT. THE ACCESS WIRE DETACHED AND IS CURRENTLY WEDGED WITHIN THE PATIENT'S ADIPOSE TISSUE. THE PHYSICIAN IS NOT CONCERNED ABOUT POSSIBLE IATROGENIC FOREIGN BODY [IFB] MIGRATION OR EMBOLISM. THERE ARE NO PLANS TO REMOVE THE EMBEDDED IFB FROM THIS PATIENT. THE TIP OF THE ACCESS WIRE IS STERILE ENCAPSULATE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 19609853 ↗

Other DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION devices

All DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page