Merit S-MAK™ 00884450012642Recalls & reported problems
Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 2
All models of Merit S-MAK (6)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884450012642), received between Jun 29, 2021 and Feb 20, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (7 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture7
- Material Separation6
- Material Integrity Problem1
- Material Twisted/Bent1
- Unraveled Material1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient5
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 20, 2025Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THE TIP OF THE WIRE (LESS THAN 1MM) DETACHED IN THE SOFT TISSUE OF THE NECK DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGIST AND PEDIATRIC SURGEON RECOMMENDED NO INTERVENTION, INTENTIONALLY LEAVING THE TIP OF THE WIRE WITHIN THE TISSUE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 21420480 ↗MalfunctionSep 3, 2024Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A FEMORAL ENTRY CATH PROCEDURE THE INNER DILATOR BROKE WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE BROKEN PIECE WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20131242 ↗InjuryAug 22, 2023Fracture; Material Integrity Problem; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT THE MICRO PUNCTURE WIRE BROKE OFF WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO SNARE THE WIRE SUCCESSFULLY TO REMOVE IT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17595922 ↗InjuryFeb 1, 2023Unraveled Material; Material Twisted/Bent; Unraveled Material; Material Twisted/Bent
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING ANTERIOR TIBIAL [AT] ARTERY ACCESS FOR A PERIPHERAL VASCULAR PROCEDURE, THE ACCESS WIRE STARTED TO UNRAVEL. THE PHYSICIAN HAD ACQUIRED RETROGRADE ARTERIAL ACCESS BUT WAS NOT HAPPY WITH THE WIRE LOCATION. THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED THE ACCESS NEEDLE AND WIRE TOGETHER. THE ACCESS WIRE WAS TRAPPED WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE WIRE HAD STARTED TO UNCOIL BUT WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED. THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT THE ACCESS WIRE TIP HAD BEEN RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. A NEW DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PATIENT PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16278574 ↗InjuryMay 11, 2022Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT WHILE OBTAINING VEIN ACCESS FOR A LEFT-SIDED PACEMAKER IMPLANT, THE DEVICE BECAME ENTANGED AND THE TIP OF THE DEVICE DETACHED WITHIN THE PATIENT. AFTER CONSULTATION, IT WAS DECIDED BY THE CLINICAN TO LEAVE THE FOREIGN BODY WITHIN THE PATIENT AS THE RISKS WERE DEEMED TO OUTWEIGHED THE BENEFITS OF RETRIEVAL. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE TO REPORT.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 14366283 ↗MalfunctionMay 11, 2022Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING VASCULAR ACCESS FOR A PROCEDURE, THE TIP OF THE ACCESS WIRE BROKE OFF AND BECAME EMBEDDED WITHIN THE PATIENT'S TISSUE. POST PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT REQUIRED AN EMERGENT MRI FOR NON-RELATED ISSUE. THE ACCOUNT WAS NOTIFIED THAT MERIT DOES NOT HAVE MRI COMPATIBILITY DATA ON ACCESS WIRE TIPS. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE PATIENT COMPLETED AN MRI STUDY. THE TIP HAS NOT BEEN REMOVED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS EVENT HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 14365497 ↗InjuryNov 9, 2021Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT THE WIRE COMPLETELY BROKE AND A C-ARM WAS NEEDED TO RETRIEVE THE BROKEN PIECE. NO PATIENT HARM REPORTED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 12780941 ↗InjuryJun 29, 2021Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT IN THE OR THE TIP BROKE OFF OF THE MICRO PUNCTURE KIT. PATIENT WAS SENT TO INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY FOR REMOVAL OF THE PORTION OF THE WIRE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 12088470 ↗
Other DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION devices
- VersaCross Connect LAAC Access Solution VXAK0007Baylis Médicale Cie Inc · Dilator, Vessel, For Percutaneous Catheterization3 deaths108 reports
- TandemLife 5740-2417Cardiacassist, Inc. · Dilator, Vessel, For Percutaneous Catheterization2 recalls0 reports
- TightRail Rotating Dilator Sheath 545-513Spectranetics Corporation · Dilator, Vessel, For Percutaneous Catheterization20 deaths74 reports
- VersaCross Connect LAAC Access Solution VXAK0003Baylis Médicale Cie Inc · Dilator, Vessel, For Percutaneous Catheterization2 deaths70 reports
- VersaCross Connect LAAC Access Solution VXAK0007Baylis Médicale Cie Inc · Dilator, Vessel, For Percutaneous Catheterization2 deaths54 reports
- AVANTI 504656XCordis Corporation · DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION1 recall2 reports
- Mini Stick MAX H965457510Angiodynamics, Inc. · DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION1 recall1 report
- Abiomed® 00884450732311Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Dilator, Vessel, For Percutaneous Catheterization1 recall1 report
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page