Skip to content

Merit Medical® 00884450015278Recalls & reported problems

Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 1

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884450015278), received between Dec 1, 2020 and Nov 18, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jun 11, 2024Open, Classified

    Medical convenience kits contain plastic syringes affected by the FDA Safety Alert issued on March 19, 2024. Leaks, breakage, and/ other quality issues have been identified that may pose a risk to patient health.

    Z-2569-2024 · Root cause: No Marketing Application · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Break2
  • Fracture2
  • Material Integrity Problem2
  • Material Separation2
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Gas/Air Leak1
  • Material Fragmentation1

Patient problems

  • Cardiac Tamponade2
  • Foreign Body In Patient2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Angina1
  • Arrhythmia1
  • Cardiac Arrest1
  • Cardiac Perforation1
  • Discomfort1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 18, 2025Break; Fracture; Material Separation; Material Integrity Problem; Break; Fracture; Material Separation; Material Integrity Problem

    UPDATE AS OF (B)(6) 2025: THE BROKEN FRAGMENT HAS BEEN RETRIEVED BUT DISCARDED BY THE CUSTOMER FACILITY. DETAILS REGARDING THE DATE, TIME, AND METHOD FOR RETRIEVAL ARE UNKNOWN AS IT WAS DIFFICULT FOR THE CUSTOMER TO PROVIDE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 23587237 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 25, 2025Gas/Air Leak; Gas/Air Leak

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THE PATIENT UNDERWENT PERICARDIOCENTESIS WITHOUT ANY PROCEDURAL COMPLICATIONS. A FOLLOW UP CHEST X-RAY DEMONSTRATED A PNEUMOPERITONEUM. SUBSEQUENT CT SCAN CONFIRMED THIS WITH NO OBVIOUS PERFORATION. CONCERN IS THAT AIR WAS INTRODUCED BECAUSE OF A FAULTY STOPCOCK (3-WAY TAP) OR CONNECTION. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE REPORT.

    Patient problems: Pneumoperitoneum

    MAUDE report 22330211 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 20, 2025Break; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem; Break; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT THE DRAINAGE CATHETER WAS INSERTED SUCCESSFULLY IN THE ANGIOGRAPHY ROOM AND THEN THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO THE FLOOR. WHEN THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED TO THE FLOOR AROUND MIDNIGHT, IT WAS FOUND THE HUB OF THE CATHETER WAS DETACHED. IT WAS UNKNOWN WHAT KIND OF TENSION WAS APPLIED, BUT IT SEEMED TO HAVE SLIPPED OUT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY REMOVING THE CATHETER AS DRAINAGE HAD BEEN COMPLETED. NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22055271 ↗
  • InjuryOct 22, 2024Material Too Rigid or Stiff; Use of Device Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Material Too Rigid or Stiff; Use of Device Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE GUIDEWIRE IN USE DURING PCI THAT LED TO THE PERICARDIAL EFFUSION WAS AN .014 W /HYDROPHILIC TIP. THE PHYSICIAN STATES THAT DUE TO THE THE STIFFNESS AND CURVE OF THE PC DRAINAGE CATHETER, THE PC CATHETER ALSO CONTRIBUTED TO THE LACERATION OF THE PERICARDIUM. PERICARDIAL ACCESS WAS VIA THE SUBXIPHOID TECHNIQUE, UNDER US GUIDANCE. PROCEDURAL ACCESS WAS VIA THE RIGHT RADIAL ARTERY AND THE PATIENT'S TIME OF DEATH WAS 6:00 PM ON (B)(6) 2024.

    Patient problems: Angina; Arrhythmia; Cardiac Arrest; Cardiac Perforation; Cardiac Tamponade; Discomfort; Exsanguination; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Ischemia; Perforation; Pleural Effusion

    MAUDE report 20511136 ↗
  • InjuryJun 29, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT AN INPATIENT EXPERIENCED HEART CHANGES THAT LED TO A CARDIAC TAMPONADE. AN EMERGENT PERICARDIOCENTESIS WAS PERFORMED BY THE CARDIOLOGY TEAM IN THE HOSPITAL ROOM TO SAVE TIME OF TRANSFER TO THE CATHETER LAB. WHILE ATTEMPTING TO INSERT THE DRAINAGE CATHETER, IT WAS CRISPY/WAVY AND COULD NOT BE INSERTED THROUGH THE PATIENT'S BODY SURFACE.

    Patient problems: Cardiac Tamponade

    MAUDE report 14861431 ↗
  • InjuryJun 9, 2022Mechanical Problem; Difficult to Remove; Obstruction of Flow; Mechanical Problem; Difficult to Remove; Obstruction of Flow

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT A PATIENT HAD BEEN RECEIVING MAINTENANCE DIALYSIS FOR END-STAGE RENAL FAILURE DUE TO NEPHROSCLEROSIS. A SCHEDULED PERICARDIOCENTESIS WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. AFTER THE ASPIRATION OF APPROXIMATELY 700 ML OF PALE-YELLOW PERICARDIAL FLUID, THE DEVICE WAS CONNECTED TO A DRAINAGE BAG. APPROXIMATELY 70 ML HAD BEEN REMOVED PER DAY. HOWEVER, THE DEVICE STOPPED DRAINING ON (B)(6) 2022 DESPITE ASPIRATION ATTEMPTS. A CATHETER OCCLUSION WAS SUSPECTED. ON (B)(6) 2022 THE CATHETER COULD NOT BE REMOVED DUE ANATOMICAL TORTUOSITY. ON THE SAME DAY ((B)(6) 2022), SURGICAL REMOVAL OF THE PC CATHETER WAS PERFORMED UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA AND MINI-THORACOTOMY OF THE STERNUM WAS COMPLETED. A FIBRIN SHEATH WAS NOTED TO HAVE ATTACHED AROUND THE DRAIN AND WAS REMOVED BY THE SURGEON. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE AND POSTSURGICAL RECOVERY WELL. EXTUBATING THE PATIENT WAS COMPLETED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED FROM ICU TO A GENERAL WARD THE NEXT DAY. POSTOP CLINICAL COURSE IS FAVORABLE. DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AFTER REMOVAL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14645588 ↗
  • InjuryDec 1, 2020Material Fragmentation; Material Separation; Material Fragmentation; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING AN EMERGENT PERICARDIAL DRAINAGE PROCEDURE FOR A CARDIAC TAMPONADE THE TIP OF THE CATHETER GOT DETACHED DURING THE WITHDRAWAL. THE TIP REMAINED IN THE PATIENT'S BODY.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 10928922 ↗

Other CATHETER, IRRIGATION devices

All CATHETER, IRRIGATION devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.