Impress® 00884450023198Recalls & reported problems
Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 2
All models of Impress (145)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884450023198), received between Nov 30, 2021 and Jun 29, 2022 — classified as 5 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture5
- Material Separation4
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 29, 2022Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING PERIPHERAL VASCULAR IMAGING OF THE LEFT LEG THE 4F CATHETER TIP DETACHED. THE PHYSICIAN HAD ACQUIRED BILATERAL RETROGRADE FEMORAL ARTERY ACCESS, AND DURING A CATHETER EXCHANGE, OVER A STIFF GUIDEWIRE UNDER FLUOROSCOPY, THE CATHETER TIP DETACHED. THE PHYSICIAN USED A VASCULAR SNARE DEVICE TO SUCCESSFULLY EXTERNALIZE THE FREE-FLOATING FOREIGN BODY FROM THE PATIENT LIBERATING THE VESSEL. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14861030 ↗InjuryMay 4, 2022Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INTERVENTION, THE CATHETER TIP DETACHED WITHIN THE PATIENT'S LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY. THE PHYSICIAN HAD ACQUIRED CONTRALATERAL RETROGRADE RIGHT FEMORAL ARTERY ACCESS WITH A PERIPHERAL SHEATH. DURING CATHETER MANIPULATIONS OVER A GUIDEWIRE, THE CATHETER TIP DETACHED WITHIN THE PATIENT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY EXTERNALIZED THE FOREIGN BODY FROM THE PATIENT LIBERATING THE ILIAC CONDUIT.. ANOTHER CATHETER WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14283050 ↗InjuryApr 19, 2022Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A PERIPHERAL ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURE, THE CATHETER TIP DETACHED WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN HAD ACQUIRED RIGHT RETROGRADE FEMORAL ARTERY ACCESS AND HAD NEGOTIATED THE PATIENT'S COMMON ILIAC BIFURCATION UNDER FLUOROSCOPY WITH A GUIDEWIRE AND A 4F CATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN NOTED THAT THE BILATERAL COMMON ILIAC ARTERIES HAD BEEN PREVIOUSLY STENTED. DURING CATHETER MANIPULATIONS OVER A STIFF GUIDEWIRE WITHIN THE PATIENT'S ABDOMINAL AORTA, THE CATHETER TIP DETACHED. THE PHYSICIAN USED A VASCULAR SNARE DEVICE TO SUCCESSFULLY EXTERNALIZED THE FOREIGN BODY LIBERATING THE VESSEL. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WELL WITH NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14145006 ↗InjuryMar 1, 2022Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A PERIPHERAL VASCULAR PROCEDURE, A CATHETER TIP DETACHED WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN HAD SUCCESSFULLY ACQUIRED RETROGRADE ARTERIAL ACCESS AND HAD NEGOTIATED THE PATIENT'S ILIO-FEMORAL CONDUIT WITH AN INTERVENTIONAL GUIDEWIRE AND 4F CATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN STATES THAT DURING A DIFFICULT CATHETER REMOVAL PROCESS, FROM THE PATIENT'S COMMON ILIAC ARTERY THE CATHETER HUB DETACHED. ADDITIONAL ATTEMPTS IN REMOVING THE CATHETER FROM THE PATIENT RESULTED IN CATHETER TIP DETACHMENT AS WELL. REMOVAL OF THE REMAINING CATHETER WAS NOT DIFFICULT. THE PHYSICIAN EXCHANGED THE PRIMARY SHEATH FOR A LONGER 6F SECONDARY SHEATH FOR FOREIGN BODY REMOVAL. THE SHEATH WAS ADVANCED OVER THE DETACHED FOREIGN BODY SUCCESSFULLY AND REMOVED LIBERATING THE PATIENT'S ILIAC CONDUIT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13640690 ↗InjuryNov 30, 2021Fracture; Fracture
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A PROCEDURE THE CATHETER TIP DETACHED WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN USED A VASCULAR SNARE DEVICE TO SUCCESSFULLY EXTERNALIZED THE FOREIGN BODY LIBERATING THE VASCULATURE. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12902300 ↗
Other CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- TrapEase Permanent Vena Cava Filter with the VisEase Angiographic Vessel Dilator 466P306AUCordis Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC6 deaths186 reports
- Dragonfly™ OPTIS™ C408646Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC4 deaths150 reports
- Dragonfly OpStar™ 1014651Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall87 reports
- LANGSTON IPN913559Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls14 reports
- Trevo 90238Stryker Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls5 reports
- Expo™ H749085263011Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls3 reports
- Expo™ H74908526501Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 report
- Expo™ H749085263001Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page