Skip to content

Impress® 00884450032534Recalls & reported problems

Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 2

All models of Impress (145)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884450032534), received between Sep 22, 2021 and Feb 13, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture5
  • Material Separation5

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • Stroke/CVA1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 13, 2024Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING AN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY PROCEDURE, A 5F HH1 CATHETER TIP DETACHED WITHIN THE PATIENT'S AORTIC ARCH DURING CATHETER MANIPULATIONS UNDER FLUOROSCOPY. THE PHYSICIAN EXPORTED THE IFB BY IMPLEMENTING AN INTRAVASCULAR GUIDEWIRE CAPTURE TECHNIQUE. THE DEVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18696671 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 18, 2023Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES DURING A CAROTID ANGIOGRAPHY PROCEDURE, THE CATHETER BROKE WHILE STILL ON THE WIRE. THE DEVICE AND DETACHED PIECE WERE SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17958912 ↗
  • InjuryNov 9, 2022Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A CEREBRAL THROMBECTOMY PROCEDURE TO REMOVE CLOT FROM AN ARTERY IN A PATIENT ACTIVELY EXPERIENCING A CEREBRAL VASCULAR STROKE (CVS), THE CATHETER TIP DETACHED NEAR THE PATIENT'S AORTA. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO EXTERNALIZED THE FOREIGN BODY WITH A VASCULAR SNARE DEVICE WHEN THE FOREIGN BODY FRAGMENTED IN TO SIX ADDITIONAL PIECES. NO FRAGMENTS MIGRATED INTO THE CEREBRAL VASCULATURE SYSTEM. ALL FRAGMENTS WERE LOCATED WITHIN THE PATIENT'S AORTA. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO TREAT THE PATIENT STROKE MEDICALLY BECAUSE ALL OPERATORS WERE ENGAGED IN RETRIEVAL OF THE FRAGMENTS FOR MORE THAN 4 HOURS. THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO COMPLETE THE THROMBECTOMY PROCEDURE RESULTING IN A CEREBRAL INFARCTION FOR THE PATIENT. PATIENT WAS PLACED ON A VENTILATOR AS OPERATORS WERE NOT ABLE TO PERFORM THROMBECTOMY SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Stroke/CVA

    MAUDE report 15764789 ↗
  • InjuryOct 6, 2021Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES DURING A PROCEDURE THE TIP OF THE CATHETER BROKE WITHIN THE FISTULA OF THE PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN SUCCESSFULLY USED A SNARE TO REMOVE THE DETACHED PIECE FROM THE PATIENT. NO PATIENT INJURY TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12584567 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 22, 2021Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A CHEMO EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE FRACTURED INTO TWO PIECES. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12513240 ↗

Other CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices

All CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page