Skip to content

Merit Laureate® 00884450033289Recalls & reported problems

Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 2

All models of Merit Laureate (6)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884450033289), received between Sep 24, 2020 and Feb 21, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture2
  • Material Integrity Problem2
  • Material Separation2
  • Material Fragmentation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 21, 2025Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHILE ATTEMPTING TO INTRODUCE AN INTERVENTIONAL DEVICE OVER THE GUIDEWIRE, THE COATING OF THE GUIDEWIRE STARTED COMING OFF ONTO THE OPERATOR'S GLOVES. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21435246 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 19, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A PERCUTANEOUS TRANSHEPATIC BILIARY DRAINAGE (PTBD) PROCEDURE, THE ACCESS WIRES BLACK JACKET DETACHED WITHIN THE PATIENT WHILE ATTEMPTING ACCESS TO THE PATIENT'S BILIARY SYSTEM. THE PHYSICIAN SUCCESSFULLY EXTERNALIZED THE FOREIGN BODY BY REMOVING THE FOREIGN BODY (JACKET) BY HAND, LIBERATING THE PATIENT FROM THE FOREIGN BODY. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17353670 ↗
  • InjuryMay 30, 2023Fracture; Material Integrity Problem; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING PROCEDURE, THE WIRE TORE OFF IN THE PATIENT. THE DEVICE WAS RETRIEVED. NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17027364 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 30, 2023Fracture; Material Integrity Problem; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A PTBD PROCEDURE THE WIRE BROKE OFF AT THE RADIAL INTRODUCTION. RETRIEVED THE BROKEN PIECES BY HAND. NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17027363 ↗
  • InjurySep 24, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A PERIPHERAL VASCULAR PROCEDURE, THE HYDROPHILIC GUIDEWIRE TIP DETACHED WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN HAD ACQUIRED RETROGRADE FEMORAL ARTERY ACCESS AND HAD NEGOTIATED THE PATIENT'S COMMON ILIAC BIFURCATION. DURING GUIDEWIRE MANIPULATIONS WITHIN THE PATIENT'S CALCIFIED COMMON ILIAC ARTERY THE GUIDEWIRE TIP DETACHED. THE PHYSICIAN USED A VASCULAR SNARE DEVICE TO SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVE THE FOREIGN BODY FROM THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WELL AND WAS DISCHARGED TO HOME WITH NO ADDITIONAL CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 10584502 ↗

Other WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices

All WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page