Skip to content

Merit Laureate® 00884450033333Recalls & reported problems

Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 2

All models of Merit Laureate (6)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884450033333), received between Nov 11, 2020 and Jan 28, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture3
  • Material Separation3
  • Material Disintegration1
  • Material Fragmentation1
  • Material Integrity Problem1
  • Particulates1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • Foreign Body In Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 28, 2026Material Disintegration; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES DURING A PROCEDURE THE OUTER JACKET OF THE GUIDEWIRE TORE OFF DURING WITHDRAWAL OF THE DEVICE. NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24199366 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 4, 2023Fracture; Material Integrity Problem; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A LOWER EXTREMITY ARTERIAL INTERVENTION, THE COATING OF THE WIRE BEGAN TO FLAKE OFF. A TORQUE DEVICE WAS USED DURING THE PROCEDURE TO STEER AND MANIPULATE THE WIRE. A NEW WIRE WAS USED TO FINISH THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT INJURY TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17680508 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 18, 2022Particulates; Particulates

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING AN UP AND OVER PROCEDURE, THE HYDROPHILIC COATING OF THE WIRE SLOUGHED OFF. IN ADDITION, THE PROCEDURE WAS PROLONGED DUE TO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE WIRE. NO PATIENT INJURY TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 15254760 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 17, 2021Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    A MEDWATCH REPORT (B)(4) ALLEGES THAT DURING A VASCULAR PROCEDURE, THE COATING ON THE HYDROPHILIC GUIDEWIRE SEPARATED OUTSIDE PATIENTS' BODY WHILE BACK LOADING A CATHETER. THE GUIDEWIRE WAS REMOVED AND EXCHANGED FOR A NEW ONE. NO PATIENT INJURY TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11509946 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 11, 2020Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A PERIPHERAL VASCULAR PROCEDURE, THE HYDROPHILIC GUIDEWIRES BLACK JACKET DETACHED WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE FOREIGN BODY WAS SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WELL WITH NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 10824265 ↗
  • InjuryNov 11, 2020Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A PERIPHERAL VASCULAR PROCEDURE, THE HYDROPHILIC GUIDEWIRES BLACK JACKET DETACHED WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE FOREIGN BODY WAS SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WELL WITH NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 10824257 ↗

Other WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices

All WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page