Impress® 00884450038161Recalls & reported problems
Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 2
All models of Impress (145)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884450038161), received between Jun 1, 2022 and Jan 24, 2024 — classified as 6 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture6
- Material Separation6
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- Foreign Body Embolism1
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- Ischemia1
- Obstruction/Occlusion1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 24, 2024Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A PROCEDURE THE DISTAL END OF THE CATHETER BROKE OFF INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN SUCCESSFULLY EXTERNALIZED THE FOREIGN BODY WITH A VASCULAR SNARE DEVICE LIBERATING THE VESSEL. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENSES TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18571586 ↗InjuryJun 14, 2023Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A CAROTID STENT DEPLOYMENT PROCEDURE, THE CATHETER TIP DETACHED WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN HAD ACQUIRED RETROGRADE ARTERIAL ACCESS AND HAD NEGOTIATED THE PATIENT'S VASCULATURE SYSTEM WITH A GUIDEWIRE AND THE 5F CATHETER. DURING CATHETER MANIPULATIONS UNDER FLUOROSCOPY THE CATHETER TIP DETACHED AND STARTED TO MIGRATE TOWARDS THE SUBCLAVIAN AND HUMERAL ARTERIES. THE PHYSICIAN SUCCESSFULLY EXTERNALIZED THE FOREIGN BODIES LIBERATING THE NATIVE VESSELS. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WELL WITH NO ADDITIONAL CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17131159 ↗InjuryJun 14, 2023Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A CAROTID STENT DEPLOYMENT PROCEDURE, THE CATHETER TIP DETACHED WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN HAD ACQUIRED RETROGRADE ARTERIAL ACCESS AND HAD NEGOTIATED THE PATIENT'S VASCULATURE SYSTEM WITH A GUIDEWIRE AND THE 5F CATHETER. DURING CATHETER MANIPULATIONS UNDER FLUOROSCOPY THE CATHETER TIP DETACHED AND STARTED TO MIGRATE TOWARDS THE SUBCLAVIAN AND HUMERAL ARTERIES. THE PHYSICIAN SUCCESSFULLY EXTERNALIZED THE FOREIGN BODIES LIBERATING THE NATIVE VESSELS. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WELL WITH NO ADDITIONAL CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17131153 ↗InjuryJan 10, 2023Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A PROCEDURE, THE IMPRESS CATHETER BROKE INTO TWO PIECES WITHIN THE PATIENT ANATOMY. THE DETACHED PIECES WERE SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVED USING A SNARE. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16134810 ↗InjuryJan 3, 2023Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A PROCEDURE, THE IMPRESS CATHETER BROKE INTO TWO PIECES WITHIN THE PATIENT ANATOMY. THE DETACHED PIECES WERE SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVED USING A SNARE. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16092045 ↗InjuryJun 1, 2022Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A DIAGNOSTIC ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURE, THE CATHETER HAD DETACHED TWICE WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN HAD ACQUIRED VASCULAR ACCESS AND DURING CATHETER MANIPULATIONS OVER A GUIDEWIRE, UNDER FLUOROSCOPY, THE CATHETER DETACHED. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY EXTERNALIZE ONLY ONE FOREIGN BODY FROM THE PATIENT WITH A VASCULAR SNARE DEVICE. THE OTHER FOREIGN BODY THAT DETACHED BECAME STUCK WITHIN THE PATIENT'S LEG. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.
Patient problems: Foreign Body Embolism; Foreign Body In Patient; Ischemia; Obstruction/Occlusion
MAUDE report 14570743 ↗
Other CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- TrapEase Permanent Vena Cava Filter with the VisEase Angiographic Vessel Dilator 466P306AUCordis Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC6 deaths186 reports
- Dragonfly™ OPTIS™ C408646Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC4 deaths150 reports
- Dragonfly OpStar™ 1014651Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall87 reports
- LANGSTON IPN913559Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls14 reports
- Trevo 90238Stryker Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls5 reports
- Expo™ H749085263011Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls3 reports
- Expo™ H74908526501Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 report
- Expo™ H749085263001Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page