Skip to content

Impress® 00884450038192Recalls & reported problems

Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 2

All models of Impress (145)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884450038192), received between May 30, 2023 and Jul 29, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 2 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture3
  • Material Separation3

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 29, 2025Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES FOR BLEEDING IN THE RIGHT ILIAC A CATHETER WAS USED IN THE LEFT FEMORAL VIA A 6F INTRODUCER. ONCE THE CATHETER WAS IN THE PATIENT A SMALL PART OF THE TIP CAME OFF THE CATHETER. AN ATTEMPT TO REMOVE THE TIP WITH A SNARE WAS UNSUCCESSFUL AND TIP REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. A SECOND DEVICE FROM THE SAME LOT WAS OPENED. THIS TIME THE ENTIRE TIP DETACHED IN THE PATIENT. DURING A REMOVAL ATTEMPT THE TIP FRAGMENTED AND ONLY SMALL AMOUNTS OF THE TIP WERE ABLE TO BE REMOVED. SMALLER PIECES OF THE TIP REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. A DIFFERENT CATHETER WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 22660712 ↗
  • InjuryJul 29, 2025Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT A VASCULAR SURGEON WAS PERFORMING A LEG ANGIOGRAM; WHILE REMOVING THE CATHETER FROM THE FEMORAL ARTERY, THE TIP OF THE CATHETER BROKE OFF. A SNARE DEVICE WAS USED TO RETRIEVE AND REMOVE THE CATHETER TIP FROM THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22660600 ↗
  • InjuryMay 30, 2023Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A TACE PROCEDURE, THE CATHETER FRACTURED AND LODGED IN THE LEFT FEMORAL ARTERY. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO SNARE THE FRAGMENT OUT WITH A SNARE, BUT THE FRAGMENT FRACTURED FURTHER. PROVIDER PLANS TO PERFORM A THROMBECTOMY PROCEDURE TO REMOVE THE FOUR FRAGMENTS.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 17027369 ↗

Other CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices

All CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page