Impress® 00884450668122Recalls & reported problems
Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 2
All models of Impress (145)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884450668122), received between Jun 27, 2023 and Aug 6, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture6
- Material Separation5
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- Foreign Body In Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 6, 2025Fracture; Fracture
A RADIOLOGIST WAS PERFORMING AN ILIAC ANGIOPLASTY. WHILE ATTEMPTING TO PASS CATHETER THROUGH STENOSED ILIAC ARTERY, AROUND 5CM OF TIP OF CATHETER BROKE OFF AND HAD TO BE RETRIEVED. THE RADIOLOGIST WAS ABLE TO RETRIEVE THE TIP BY USING AN ANGIOPLASTY BALLOON AND STENT TO OPEN VESSELS AROUND FRAGMENT. NO REPORTED INJURY OR ADDITIONAL PATIENT DETAILS WERE PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22731505 ↗InjuryMay 27, 2025Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES AFTER INSERTING THE DEVICES INTO THE PATIENT AND ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE RIM PROBE FROM THE INTRODUCER, IT FRACTURED, LEAVING THE BASE IN THE ILIAC ARTERY. THE FOREIGN BODY WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22091829 ↗InjuryNov 19, 2024Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE BLACK TIP OF THE CATHETER SNAPPED WHILST TRYING TO REMOVE THE CATHETER OVER AN AMPLTAZ GUIDEWIRE. THE TIP WAS SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVED. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20726829 ↗InjurySep 18, 2024Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING ARTERIAL ACCESS FOR A PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INTERVENTION, THE CATHETER TIP DETACHED AT THE BLACK DISTAL TIP. THE DETACHED DEVICE WAS SUCCESSFULLY RECOVERED USING AN ENDOVASCULAR SNARE REMOVAL. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20248170 ↗InjuryAug 27, 2024Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THE TIP OF A RIM CATHETER BROKE OFF IN A PATIENT'S VESSEL DURING A ROUTINE AV FISTULOGRAM. IT WAS RETRIEVED WITH A SNARE DEVICE AND THE PATIENT WAS NOT HARMED. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE TO REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20081833 ↗InjuryJun 27, 2023Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING AN ANGIOGRAM PROCEDURE THE TIP OF THE CATHETER DETACHED WITHIN THE PATIENT. WHILE ATTEMPTING TO CROSS THROUGH THE COMMON ILIAC ARTERY, THE TIP OF THE DEVICE GOT STUCK WITHIN THE HIGHLY CALCIFIED VESSEL AND DETACHED WITHIN THE PATIENT. THERE WAS AN ATTEMPT TO REMOVE THE FOREIGN BODY USING A SNARE, AND WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. THE PATIENT WAS SENT TO SURGERY TO REMOVE THE DETACHED TIP. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE TO REPORT.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 17213892 ↗
Other Catheter, intravascular, diagnostic devices
- TrapEase Permanent Vena Cava Filter with the VisEase Angiographic Vessel Dilator 466P306AUCordis Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC6 deaths186 reports
- Dragonfly™ OPTIS™ C408646Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC4 deaths150 reports
- Dragonfly OpStar™ 1014651Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall87 reports
- LANGSTON IPN913559Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls14 reports
- Trevo 90238Stryker Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls5 reports
- Expo™ H749085263011Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls3 reports
- Expo™ H74908526501Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 report
- Expo™ H749085263001Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page