Skip to content

Impress® 00884450688236Recalls & reported problems

Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 2

All models of Impress (145)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
1
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884450688236), received between Jan 9, 2026 and Jan 20, 2026 — classified as 1 death, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 2 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture2
  • Material Fragmentation2
  • Material Separation2
  • Break1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 20, 2026Break; Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT PRIOR TO USE, THE TIP OF THE DIAGNOSTIC CATHETER WAS FOUND TO BE DETACHED WITHIN THE PACKAGING. NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24119188 ↗
  • DeathJan 9, 2026Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT A 71-YEAR-OLD MALE WITH SIGNIFICANT COMORBIDITIES UNDERWENT EMERGENCY AORTOGRAPHY ON (B)(6) 2025, FOR SUSPECTED MESENTERIC ARTERIAL ISCHEMIA. THE PATIENT WAS CRITICALLY ILL PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE, WITH HEMODYNAMIC INSTABILITY, INTUBATION, AND VASOACTIVE SUPPORT. DURING REMOVAL OF THE GUIDEWIRE AND EXIT OF THE PIGTAIL CATHETER FROM THE INTRODUCER, FRAGMENTATION OF THE CATHETER TIP WAS IDENTIFIED UNDER FLUOROSCOPY. NO IRREGULARITIES WERE OBSERVED PRIOR TO USE. THE BLACK PIGTAIL SEGMENT FRAGMENTED DURING RETRIEVAL, RESULTING IN FIVE FRAGMENTS; ONE WAS RECOVERED, AND FOUR EMBOLIZED TO THE LEFT HYPOGASTRIC ARTERY AND LEFT PROXIMAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. SNARE-BASED RETRIEVAL WAS ATTEMPTED WITH PARTIAL SUCCESS; COMPLETE EXTRACTION WAS NOT POSSIBLE. DUE TO THE PATIENT'S DETERIORATING CONDITION, NO FURTHER INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED AT THAT TIME. ANOTHER CATHETER FROM THE SAME LOT FRAGMENTED UPON REMOVAL FROM THE PACKAGING DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT DIED ON (B)(6) 2025. CAUSE OF DEATH WAS DOCUMENTED AS MULTI-ORGAN FAILURE. THE ATTENDING PHYSICIAN STATED THAT THE CATHETER FRAGMENTATION WAS NOT THE ULTIMATE CAUSE OF DEATH BUT CONTRIBUTED BY DELAYING

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 24021718 ↗

Other Catheter, intravascular, diagnostic devices

All Catheter, intravascular, diagnostic devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page