Skip to content

AERO® G (REF 90129-212)Recalls & reported problems

Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
2
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884450703960), received between Sep 11, 2024 and Sep 12, 2024 — classified as 2 deaths.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 2 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem2
  • Difficult to Open or Close2

Patient problems

  • Cardiac Arrest2
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding2
  • Perforation2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • DeathSep 12, 2024Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Difficult to Open or Close; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Difficult to Open or Close

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A TRACHEOBRONCHIAL STENT DEPLOYMENT PROCEDURE, THE CLINICIAN WAS UNABLE TO DEPLOY A STENT BY SQUEEZING THE DEPLOYMENT TRIGGER. THEY SWITCHED TO A NEW STENT AND HAD A SIMILAR ISSUE BUT WERE SUCCESSFUL IN DEPLOYING THE STENT, BUT THE STENT HAD ENFOLDED [INVAGINATED]. THE 12X40 STENT WAS PLACED VIA DIRECT VISION. NO DAMAGE WAS NOTED TO THE STENT OR THE DEVICE BEFORE OR DURING THE DEPLOYMENT ATTEMPT. THE CLINICIAN TRIED TO ADJUST THE STENT USING A BALLOON INFLATION TECHNIQUE AND ENDED UP PERFORATING THE TRACHEOBRONCHIAL WALL. THE PHYSICIAN STATES THE PATIENT WAS NOT IN GOOD CONDITION BEFORE THE PROCEDURE. THE 58-YEAR-OLD FEMALE PATIENT WHO SUFFERED FROM A LARGE CANCEROUS ENDOBRONCHIAL TUMOR LIKELY CONTRIBUTED TO THE PATIENT'S TRACHEOBRONCHIAL PERFORATION BY WEAKENING THE TRACHEAL WALL DURING THE BALLOON EXPANSION TECHNIQUE RESULTED IN PERFORATION. A CODE WAS INITIATED PER HOSPITAL PROTOCOLS BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. THE PATIENT EXPIRED AT 4:15 PM THE SAME DAY. COD MASSIVE HEMORRHAGE. THE PATIENT ALSO EXPERIENCED HEMOPTYSIS 1 WEEK BEFORE THE ACTUAL STENT PLACEMENT AND UNDERWENT PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY (PDT) TREATMENT 4 WEEKS BEFORE THAT ACTUAL STENT PLACEMENT. A

    Patient problems: Cardiac Arrest; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Perforation

    MAUDE report 20204675 ↗
  • DeathSep 11, 2024Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Difficult to Open or Close; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Difficult to Open or Close

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A TRACHEOBRONCHIAL STENT DEPLOYMENT PROCEDURE, THE CLINICIAN WAS UNABLE TO DEPLOY A STENT BY SQUEEZING THE DEPLOYMENT TRIGGER. THEY SWITCHED TO A NEW STENT AND HAD A SIMILAR ISSUE BUT WERE SUCCESSFUL IN DEPLOYING THE STENT, BUT THE STENT HAD ENFOLDED [INVAGINATED]. THE 12X40 STENT WAS PLACED VIA DIRECT VISION. NO DAMAGE WAS NOTED TO THE STENT OR THE DEVICE BEFORE OR DURING THE DEPLOYMENT ATTEMPT. THE CLINICIAN TRIED TO ADJUST THE STENT USING A BALLOON INFLATION TECHNIQUE AND ENDED UP PERFORATING THE TRACHEOBRONCHIAL WALL. THE PHYSICIAN STATES THE PATIENT WAS NOT IN GOOD CONDITION BEFORE THE PROCEDURE. THE 58-YEAR-OLD FEMALE PATIENT WHO SUFFERED FROM A LARGE CANCEROUS ENDOBRONCHIAL TUMOR LIKELY CONTRIBUTED TO THE PATIENT'S TRACHEOBRONCHIAL PERFORATION BY WEAKENING THE TRACHEAL WALL DURING THE BALLOON EXPANSION TECHNIQUE RESULTED IN PERFORATION. A CODE WAS INITIATED PER HOSPITAL PROTOCOLS BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. THE PATIENT EXPIRED AT 4:15 PM THE SAME DAY. COD MASSIVE HEMORRHAGE. THE PATIENT ALSO EXPERIENCED HEMOPTYSIS 1 WEEK BEFORE THE ACTUAL STENT PLACEMENT AND UNDERWENT PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY (PDT) TREATMENT 4 WEEKS BEFORE THAT ACTUAL STENT PLACEMENT. A

    Patient problems: Cardiac Arrest; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Perforation

    MAUDE report 20194492 ↗

Other Prosthesis, tracheal, expandable devices

All Prosthesis, tracheal, expandable devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.