Superion Interspinous Spacer 14mmRecalls & reported problems
Vertiflex, Inc. · Superion Interspinous Spacer, 14mm · Class 3 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884662000284), received between Sep 13, 2017 and Jun 20, 2024 — classified as 5 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
- Migration2
- Unintended Movement1
Patient problems
- Pain3
- Bacterial Infection1
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Implant Pain1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- Tissue Damage1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 20, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SUPERION INDIRECT DECOMPRESSION SPACER (SPACER) PATIENT DEVELOPED PAIN AT THE SURGICAL SITE AND DOWN LEG. THE PHYSICIAN DETERMINED FROM IMAGING THAT THE IMPLANT MAY HAVE BEEN OVERSIZED AND DECIDED TO REPLACE THE DEVICE WITH A REDUCED SIZE. THE PATIENT WAS DOING FINE POST-OPERATIVELY. THE EXPLANTED SPACER AS DISPOSED OF BY THE MEDICAL FACILITY.
Patient problems: Implant Pain; Pain
MAUDE report 19579247 ↗InjuryJan 29, 2022Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED MIGRATION OF THE IMPLANT AND RETURN OF THE PREEXISTING PAIN. RADIOGRAPHY CONFIRMED A SLIGHT MIGRATION OF THE DEVICE TO BE A/P, ANTERIOR-POSTERIOR DISPLACEMENT. DURING THE REVISION PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED MULTIPLE TIMES TO LOOSEN THE IMPLANT USING THE DRIVER, ON THE FINAL ATTEMPT IT WAS NOTED THE PRONGS ON THE DRIVER WERE BENT. A NEW DRIVER WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY LOOSEN THE IMPLANT; HOWEVER, THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO REMOVE THE IMPLANT. THE IMPLANT WAS RETIGHTENED, AND THE CASE ABORTED. THE PATIENT WAS REFERRED TO A SPINE SURGEON TO EXPLANT THE MIGRATED IMPLANT DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13390050 ↗InjuryJul 16, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT SEVERAL DAYS AFTER THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A SPACER EXPLANT PROCEDURE (MFR REPORT NUMBER 3006630150-2021-03815), THE PATIENT DEVELOPED A PROCEDURE RELATED INFECTION AND EXPERIENCED PAIN, REDNESS, AND MINIMAL PURULENT DISCHARGE AT THE LOWER LUMBAR INCISION SITE. THE PATIENT WAS ADMINISTERED CEPHALEXIN AND THE EVENT RESOLVED.
Patient problems: Bacterial Infection; Pain
MAUDE report 12185787 ↗InjuryJul 16, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Migration; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN INCREASE OF ACUTE AXIAL AND RADICULAR LOW BACK PAIN. THE X-RAY TAKEN REVEALED THAT THE CAM LOBE WAS BROKEN. THE INFERIOR ARM OF THE SPACER WAS DISLOCATED AND DISLODGED POSTERIOR. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN EXPLANT PROCEDURE WHERE ALL THE PIECES OF THE SPACER WERE EXPLANTED. THE PATIENT FELT A DRAMATIC IMPROVEMENT POST-OPERATIVELY. THE DEVICE WILL NOT BE RETURNED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 12185265 ↗InjurySep 13, 2017Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Unintended Movement; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Unintended Movement
MANUFACTURER'S CASE COVERAGE SPECIALIST FORWARDED X-RAY IMAGES SUGGESTING "DISLODGEMENT OF L3-4 SUPERION." DEVICE REMAINS IN SITU.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 6863372 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Spinous Process Spacer/Plate devices
- Superion™ 101-9812Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation · Prosthesis, Spinous Process Spacer/Plate2 recalls810 reports
- Superion™ 101-9810Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation · Prosthesis, Spinous Process Spacer/Plate1 recall356 reports
- Superion™ 101-9814Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation · Prosthesis, Spinous Process Spacer/Plate2 recalls295 reports
- Superion™ SUI 102-9800Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation · Prosthesis, Spinous Process Spacer/Plate2 recalls123 reports
- Superion™ 101-9808Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation · Prosthesis, Spinous Process Spacer/Plate2 recalls4 reports
- Vertiflex™ VIP 140-9800Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation · Prosthesis, Spinous Process Spacer/Plate1 recall23 reports
- Superion™ 101-9816Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation · Prosthesis, Spinous Process Spacer/Plate1 recall23 reports
- X-STOP® Interspinous Spacer 1-3210Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Prosthesis, spinous process spacer/plate5 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page