Skip to content

Panta 2 Arthrodesis Nail System PAN-1010-10150Recalls & reported problems

Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PANTA NAIL. 10MM DIA. X 150MM · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00885556828977), received between Nov 9, 2023 and Nov 9, 2023 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1

Patient problems

  • Arthralgia1
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 9, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, AFTER AN INTERNAL FIXATION SURGERY WITH A LEFT ANKLE PCC FUSION W/INTEGRA IM PANTA NAIL HAD BEEN PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. ON (B)(6) 2023, COMPLAINTS OF PAIN CONTINUED, X-RAY IMAGING APPEARS TO SHOW THE IM NAIL INTACT BUT NO OSSEOUS FUSION ACROSS THE TIBIOTALAR OR SUBTALAR JOINT (NON-UNION) AND A CT SCAN SHOWING SMALL AMOUNT OF LUCENCY ADJACENT TO THE DISTAL PORTION ON THE IM ROD COMPATIBLE WITH MILD LOOSENING WITHOUT OSSEOUS FUSION ACROSS THE TIBIOTALAR OR SUBTALAR JOINT SPACES. ON (B)(6) 2023, ON A TELEMED VISIT, THE PATIENT ADMITS TO PREMATURELY WALKING ON FOOT, DENIES ANKLE PAIN AT THIS TIME BUT SURGEON DISCUSSED CT FINDINGS AND POSSIBLE NEED FOR HW REMOVAL/REVISION AND ADVISED TO REPEAT CT SCAN. ON (B)(6) 2023, X-RAY ANKLE IMAGING REPORT REVEALED AN INTERVAL DEVELOPMENT OF A FRACTURE THROUGH THE IM ROD AT THE LEVEL OF THE TIBIAL METAPHYSIS AS WELL AS INTERVAL DEVELOPMENT OF LUCENCY ALONG THE CALCANEAL SCREWS MEASURING UP TO 1 MM. A SECOND SURGEON DIAGNOSED PAINFUL HW WITH PSEUDOARTHROSIS IN THE LEFT TTC FUSION, A BROKEN IM ROD, METATARSALGIA, LL LIMB. A NEW XRAY SHOWED THE CRACK IN THE NAIL¿ FOR WHICH PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION ON (B)(6) 2024 WHICH INCLUD

    Patient problems: Arthralgia; Inadequate Osseointegration; Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture; Pain

    MAUDE report 18104464 ↗

Other ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES devices

All ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page