ENGAGE 1-10012-450Recalls & reported problems
Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ENGAGE POROUS TIBIAL TRAY SIZE 4-RIGHT MEDIAL · Class 2 · Implant
All models of ENGAGE (80)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00885556873182), received between May 9, 2022 and Dec 19, 2023 — classified as 4 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (1 report).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
4 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K190439, K230653); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- May 2, 2023Class IIOpen, Classified
Recent complaint data indicates that the revision rate may be trending higher than corresponding similar devices in global joint replacement registries. The data identifies a potential signal that the performance is an outlier versus the state of the art with respect to the risk for revision.
Z-1672-2023 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Failure to Osseointegrate1
- Malposition of Device1
Patient problems
- Deformity/ Disfigurement2
- Pain2
- Arthralgia1
- Discomfort1
- Inadequate Osseointegration1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 19, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
IT WAS THAT, AFTER A UKA HAD BEEN PERFORMED ON (B)(4) 2023, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION SURGERY TO A TKA ON (B)(4) 2023, DUE TO THE ENGAGE POROUS TIBIAL TRAY SZ 4-RT MED NOT BEING INGROWN AND HAD STARTUP PAIN. IN ADDITION, ONE (1) ENGAGE TIBIAL INSERT SZ 4-RT MED 9MM, ONE (1) ENGAGE POROUS FEMORAL SZ 5-RT MED AND ONE (1) ENGAGE POROUS FEMORAL SZ 5-RT MED WERE REMOVED.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain
MAUDE report 18359968 ↗InjuryMay 26, 2023Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, EIGHT MONTHS AFTER UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2020, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PAIN. A POST-OPERATIVE X-RAY SHOWED RADIOLUCENCY AROUND THE ANCHOR AND FRACTURE OF THE ANCHOR. BASED ON THE X-RAYS PROVIDED, THE IMPLANT WAS MALPOSITIONED WITH THE TRAY NOT FULLY SEATED ANTERIORLY. LOADING OF THE IMPLANT DURING NORMAL ACTIVITY WOULD RESULT IN HIGHER THAN NORMAL FORCES GENERATED ON THE ANCHOR COMPONENT, CAUSING A LEVERING EFFECT. THIS ADVERSE EVENT WAS TREATED WITH REVISION SURGERY TO TKA ON (B)(6) 2021.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 17014929 ↗InjuryMay 9, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, AFTER A RIGHT UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY HAD BEEN PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT BEGAN EXPERIENCING SOME DISCOMFORT. POSTOPERATIVE X-RAYS PERFORMED DURING FOLLOW UP SHOWED THE TIBIA COLLAPSED ANTERIORLY INTO VALGUS WITH "BLOW-OUT" OF MEDIAL TIBIAL. THE SURGEON STATED THAT THE FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS PLACED MORE MEDIALLY THAN DESIRED DUE TO PRE-EXISTING TIBIA VARA DEFORMITY, LEADING TO EDGE LOADING ON THE TIBIA. A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022 TO TREAT THIS ADVERSE EVENT. DURING THIS PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON DECIDED TO REMOVE ALL THE ELEMENTS FROM THE PROSTHESIS CONSTRUCT AND REPLACE THEM WITH A FULL TKA SYSTEM. THE PATIENT'S OUTCOME IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Deformity/ Disfigurement; Discomfort
MAUDE report 14332826 ↗InjuryMay 9, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, AFTER AN UNCEMENTED RIGHT KNEE UNICOMPARTMENTAL ARTHROPLASTY HAD BEEN PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT START EXPERIENCING PAIN WHEN WALKING. POSTOPERATIVE RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING APPEAR TO SHOW A MALPOSITION OF THE TIBIAL TRAY AND A MEDIALIZED FEMORAL COMPONENT RESULTING IN EDGE LOADING OF TIBIAL TRAY. A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022 TO TREAT THIS ADVERSE EVENT. DURING THIS PROCEDURE, THE TIBIAL TRAY WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW CEMENTED SIZE 4 TIBIAL TRAY AND THE TIBIAL INSERT WAS UPSIZED FROM A 9MM TO A 11MM. THE PATIENT'S OUTCOME AND CURRENT HEALTH STATUS IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Arthralgia; Deformity/ Disfigurement
MAUDE report 14332691 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K190439, K230653. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2621-2023 · Aug 31, 2023 · Open, Classifiedsmith&nephew LEGION OXINUM POSTERIOR STABILIZED NONPOROUS FERMOAL COMPONENT, SIZE 5N, LEFT, NARROW, REF 71421265; knee joint
- Z-1670-2023 · May 2, 2023 · Open, ClassifiedSmith&Nephew ENGAGE Cementless Partial Knee System, Porous Femoral components, Part Numbers: a) REF 1-10003-100 (SIZE 1 Right Medial); b) REF 1-10003-110 (SIZE 1 Left Medial);
- Z-1671-2023 · May 2, 2023 · Open, ClassifiedSmith&Nephew ENGAGE Cementless Partial Knee System, Tibial Anchor Stem, Part Numbers: a) REF 1-10011-100 (SIZE 1-2), b) REF 1-10011-200 (SIZE 3-4), c) REF 1-10011-300 (SIZE 5-6
- Z-1673-2023 · May 2, 2023 · Open, ClassifiedSmith&Nephew ENGAGE Cementless Partial Knee System, Coated Tibial Insert, Part Numbers: a) REF 1-10013-109, SIZE 1-LEFT MED, 9MM; b) REF 1-10013-110, SIZE 1-LEFT MED, 10MM; c)
Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, NON-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices
- LinkSymphoKnee 880-307/21WALDEMAR LINK GmbH & Co. KG · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, NON-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER2 recalls2 reports
- Scorpio 73-3710Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, NON-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER2 recalls1 report
- Scorpio 73-3110Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, NON-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER2 recalls0 reports
- Arthrex® AR-503-TTTEArthrex, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, NON-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER1 recall14 reports
- Arthrex® AR-503-TTTJArthrex, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, NON-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER1 recall9 reports
- ENGAGE 1-10011-300Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, NON-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER1 recall7 reports
- Arthrex® AR-503-TTTGArthrex, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, NON-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER1 recall7 reports
- ENGAGE 1-10003-400Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, NON-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER1 recall6 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page