BioPince™ Full Core Biopsy Instrument 360-1080-01Recalls & reported problems
Argon Medical Devices, Inc. · BioPince™ Full Core Biopsy Instrument 18Gx10cm · Class 2
All models of BioPince Full Core Biopsy Instrument (5)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 13
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 13 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00886333004379), received between Jun 17, 2020 and Sep 11, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries, 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K904987); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Jul 2, 2024Class IIOpen, Classified
Holes have been identified in biopsy instrument packaging trays compromising the sterile barrier, which may lead to cross contamination, or the introduction of micro-organisms into the access site, which could lead to an infectious process, bacteremia, or sepsis.
Z-3192-2024 · Root cause: Packaging change control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break3
- Failure to Obtain Sample3
- Use of Device Problem3
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
- Mechanical Problem1
- Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Pneumothorax2
- Pseudoaneurysm2
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- Dyspnea1
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
Recent adverse event reports
The 13 most recent of 13 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 11, 2025Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
REPORTER INDICATED "THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED DUE TO "LOWER BACK PAIN ACCOMPANIED BY WEAKNESS IN BOTH LOWER LIMBS FOR 3 YEARS, WORSENING FOR 3 DAYS." CT SCAN ON (B)(6)2025 SHOWED A MASS IN THE UPPER LOBE OF THE LEFT LUNG, SUGGESTING A HIGH POSSIBILITY OF MALIGNANT LESIONS. FURTHER EXAMINATION IS RECOMMENDED. THE POSSIBILITY OF MALIGNANCY CANNOT BE RULED OUT IN THE PATIENT'S LUNG SPACE OCCUPYING LESIONS. AFTER SIGNING THE INFORMED CONSENT FORM, PERCUTANEOUS LUNG BIOPSY WAS PERFORMED UNDER CT GUIDANCE. AFTER CT POSITIONING, LOCAL DISINFECTION WAS PERFORMED, AND 5% LIDOCAINE WAS USED TO INFILTRATE AND ANESTHETIZE THE PLEURA LAYER BY LAYER ALONG THE POSITIONING POINT. AFTER THE COAXIAL GUIDE NEEDLE WAS INSERTED 2.5CM, THE CT POSITIONING INDICATED THAT THE NEEDLE TIP HAD REACHED THE EDGE OF THE PLEURAL LESION. THE NEEDLE CENTER WAS REMOVED, AND THE DEPTH OF THE DISPOSABLE BIOPSY NEEDLE WAS ADJUSTED TO 23MM. TWO NEEDLE BIOPSIES WERE PERFORMED, AND CORD LIKE TISSUE WAS VISIBLE. AFTER FIXING WITH SPECIMEN SOLUTION, THE PATIENT WAS SENT TO THE PATHOLOGY DEPARTMENT. AFTER REMOVING THE COAXIAL GUIDE NEEDLE AND PERFORMING LOCAL DISINFECTION AND BANDAGING, A CHEST CT SCAN SHOWED NO OBVIOUS PNEUM
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23027936 ↗InjuryJul 2, 2025Failure to Obtain Sample; Failure to Obtain Sample
CUSTOMER REPORTED "ON (B)(6) 2025, DURING PERCUTANEOUS LUNG PUNCTURE, THERE WAS NO RESPONSE TO THE DISPOSABLE BIOPSY NEEDLE SHRAPNEL. ONE NEEDLE WAS IMMEDIATELY REPLACED, RESULTING IN PROLONGED OPERATION TIME AND SYMPTOMS OF SHORTNESS OF BREATH AND SUFFOCATION IN THE PATIENT. CT SHOWED PNEUMOTHORAX. IMMEDIATE CLOSED CHEST DRAINAGE WAS PERFORMED, AND THE PATIENT'S SYMPTOMS WERE RELIEVED."
Patient problems: Dyspnea; Pneumothorax
MAUDE report 22384424 ↗InjuryJul 23, 2024Break; Break
BREAKAGE OF A BIOPINCE BREAST BIOPSY NEEDLE DURING BIOPSY ON (B)(6) 2024 WITHOUT THIS BEING NOTICED BY THE DOCTOR. A METAL FRAGMENT REMAINED IN THE LEFT BREAST UNTIL 10 JUNE, WHEN IT WAS EXPELLED. THE DOCTOR CHECKED FOLLOWING REMOVAL WITH A MAMMOGRAM TO ENSURE THERE WAS NO METALLIC IN THE LEFT BREAST.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 19812709 ↗InjuryJun 30, 2024Failure to Obtain Sample; Failure to Obtain Sample
THE REPORTER INDICATED MULTIPLE BIOPINCE NEEDLES (18GA 10CM) WERE CATCHING SOFT TISSUE BETWEEN THE INNER STYLET AND THE OUTER SAMPLE CYLINDER PRIOR TO FIRING. THIS RESULTED IN INCOMPLETE SAMPLES, ABSENT SAMPLES, AND-IN THE FINAL CASE-A RENAL PSEUDOANEURYSM, THE PSEUDOANEURYSM OCCURRED WITHOUT THE NEEDLE BEING FIRED. WILL RETURN ALL UNITS WITH THIS LOT NUMBER DUE TO MULTIPLE OCCURRENCES. THIS REPORT IS FOR THE RENAL PSEUDOANEURYSM.
Patient problems: Pseudoaneurysm
MAUDE report 19641060 ↗InjuryMay 8, 2024Failure to Obtain Sample; Failure to Obtain Sample
A CUSTOMER REPORTED MULTIPLE BIOPSY NEEDLES (18G 10 CM) AT LEAST 7 USED ON 5 SEPARATE PATIENTS WERE CATCHING SOFT TISSUE BETWEEN THE INNER STYLET AND THE OUTER SAMPLE CYLINDER PRIOR TO FIRING. THIS RESULTED IN INCOMPLETE SAMPLES ABSENT SAMPLE AND IN THE FINAL CASE A RENAL PSEDUOANEURYSM. THE PSEUDOANEURYSM OCCURRED WITHOUT THE NEEDLE BEING FIRED.
Patient problems: Pseudoaneurysm
MAUDE report 19274224 ↗InjuryApr 26, 2021Use of Device Problem
THE HOSPITAL USES THE BIOPSY NEEDLE TO PUNCTURE THE LUNG FOR THE PATIENT. AFTER THE BIOPSY SAMPLE IS TAKEN, THE TISSUE IS PUSHED OUT FROM THE BIOPSY NEEDLE, THE TAIL OF THE BIOPSY GUN SPLITS AND AUTOMATICALLY TRIGGERS, RESULTING IN THE USER'S HAND STABBING.
Patient problems: Laceration(s)
MAUDE report 11725301 ↗MalfunctionMar 25, 2021Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure
I WAS TO PERFORM A CT GUIDED LUNG BIOPSY TO DIAGNOSE WHAT WAS ASSUMED TO BE A LUNG CANCER. AFTER PLACEMENT OF A COAXIAL NEEDLE INTO THE NODULE, THE FIRST TWO BIOPINCE NEEDLES YIELDED NO SAMPLE (THESE ARE THE NEEDLES THAT HAVE BEEN RETURNED). THIS LEAD TO A DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE DURING WHICH THE PATIENT DEVELOPED A PNEUMOTHORAX (COLLAPSED LUNG) AND THE COAXIAL NEEDLE POSITION WAS LOST. ALTHOUGH A COLLAPSED LUNG IS A RECOGNIZED COMPLICATION, THE DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE DUE TO EQUIPMENT FAILURE IS LIKELY TO HAVE SIGNIFICANTLY WORSENED THIS SITUATION. ALTHOUGH WE ATTEMPTED A THIRD SAMPLE WITH ANOTHER NEEDLE WHICH DID PROVIDE A SAMPLE, BY THIS POINT COAXIAL NEEDLE POSITION HAD BEEN LOST AND THE SAMPLE WAS NEGATIVE FOR CANCER (DUE TO INCORRECT NEEDLE POSITION). THE PATIENT ALSO NEEDED ADMITTED TO HOSPITAL FOR SEVERAL DAYS RATHER THAN BE DISCHARGED THAT AFTERNOON. IN SUMMARY, BIOPSY NEEDLE FAILURE X2 IS LIKELY TO HAVE BEEN A SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTOR TO LUNG COLLAPSE DEVELOPMENT AND NON-DIAGNOSTIC SAMPLE GIVEN THE TIME DELAY INTRODUCED.
Patient problems: Pneumothorax
MAUDE report 11572532 ↗MalfunctionDec 18, 2020Mechanical Problem
THE DEVICE WAS FUNCTIONAL IN ITS FIRING MECHANISM HOWEVER DID NOT PULL A CORE OF THE LIVER TISSUE THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TWICE AND WITH NO RESULT OPTED TO OPEN A NEW DEVICE AS TO NOT PUT THE PATIENT AT INCREASED RISK FOR BLEEDING.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 11040344 ↗MalfunctionDec 5, 2020Use of Device Problem
DR. (B)(6) DID A LIVER BX AND USED TWO BIOPSY GUNS WHERE NO SAMPLE WAS OBTAINED (JUST BLOOD). HE HAD TO USE A THIRD NEEDLE WITH A DIFFERENT LOT NUMBER AND FINALLY GOT SPECIMEN. SO INSTEAD OF THE USUAL 2-3 PASSES, HE ENDED UP DOING 7 PASSES IN A TRANSPLANT LIVER TO GET ENOUGH CORES TO SEND TO PATH. ANOTHER PHYSICIAN HAD ISSUES WITH IT THIS WEEKEND AS WELL AND ACCORDING TO THE OTHER PHYSICIANS THIS HAS HAPPENED TO THEM IN THE PAST.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10950930 ↗MalfunctionSep 10, 2020Use of Device Problem
NUMBER OF PATIENT: 1. POSITION: PRONE. LESION LOCATION:APICAL SEGMENT (S I) OF RIGHT LUNG. LESION SIZE:= 1.0 CM. TECHNIQUE: CO-AXIAL (MCXS1810BP). RESULT: INCOMPLETE SAMPLE (EMPTY GUN). COMPLICATION: PARENCHYMAL HEMORRHAGE.
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding
MAUDE report 10515414 ↗MalfunctionAug 3, 2020Break; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress
MalfunctionJul 3, 2020Break
THE COMPLAINT DESCRIPTION ONLY INDICATES "BLADE UP". THE RETURNED SAMPLE TO ARGON FOUND THAT THE PINCER HAD BROKEN OFF FROM THE DEVICE. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE MISSING PIECE HAD TO BE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10227725 ↗MalfunctionJun 17, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
APPLICATION/PROCEDURE: BIOPSY SOFT TISSUE / BREAST. PROCESS/PRODUCT GROUP: BIOPINCE TO TAKE A BREAST BIOPSY. COMPLAINT SITUATION: LAST WEEK (WEEK FROM (B)(6) 2020) A WOMAN WITH BREAST CANCER HAD A BIOPSY, AND THE NEXT DAY IN THE MRI SCAN. A BREAST PHOTO WAS TAKEN YESTERDAY (MONDAY (B)(6) 2020) AND THEN THEY SAW THE PIECE OF METAL, ALSO LATER ON THE MRI SCAN. HER BREAST WILL BE AMPUTATED AFTER THE IRRADIATION AND THEN OUR REQUEST WAS TO KEEP THAT METAL PIECE IN DUE TIME. SO THAT WE CAN SEND THIS TO ARGON FOR INVESTIGATION. THE BREAST WILL BE AMPUTATED IN THE COMING PERIOD, AFTER THAT THEY WILL TAKE OUT THE METAL PIECE AND KEEP IT FOR US. SO THAT IT CAN BE SENT TO ARGON. THE COMPLAINT WAS ALREADY INTERNALLY REGISTERED UNDER NO. (B)(4) BY THE QUALITY DEPARTMENT.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 10165242 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K904987. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2427-2020 · Dec 2, 2019 · TerminatedBioPince Full Core Biopsy Instrument 16ga x 15cm.,Use with Optional CO-Axial Needle MCXS1615BP. QTY.: 5/CS - Product Usage: The disposable, automatic BioPince Full Core Biopsy Ins
Other Instrument, Biopsy devices
- MAX-CORE MC1616Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY1 recall4,258 reports
- ENCOR® ECP017GSenorx, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY1 recall4,186 reports
- MAX-CORE MC1820Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY1 recall2,404 reports
- MAX-CORE MC1816Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY1 recall1 death848 reports
- MAX-CORE MC1410Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY1 recall399 reports
- MAX-CORE MC1610Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY1 recall394 reports
- ENCOR® ECP0110GVSenorx, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY392 reports
- ENCOR® ECP0110GSenorx, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, BIOPSY390 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page