ReLine 10060445Recalls & reported problems
Nuvasive, Inc. · RELINE-O X-Conn, 45-65mm 6.0 LP Adj · Class 2 · Implant
All models of ReLine (129)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00887517535078), received between Feb 9, 2017 and Sep 16, 2022 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture1
- Positioning Failure1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant1
- Fall1
- Pain1
- Vertebral Fracture1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 16, 2022Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THAT PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL POSTERIOR FIXATION PROCEDURE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, AS THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO TIGHTEN THE LOCKING CAM OF THE CROSS CONNECTOR ON THE ROD, THE CAM SPUN AND WAS UNABLE TO BE TIGHTENED. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE SURGEON ENCOUNTERED DIFFICULTIES IN REMOVAL OF THE CONNECTOR AND HAD TO USE A LESKAL TO RIP THE DEVICE OUT OF THE CONSTRUCT, RESULTING IN A BROKEN PEDICLE. AS A RESULT, THE FUSION HAD TO BE EXTENDED. NO FURTHER PATIENT IMPACT WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Vertebral Fracture
MAUDE report 15442596 ↗MalfunctionFeb 9, 2017Fracture; Fracture
A FEMALE PATIENT UNDERWENT A POSTERIOR FIXATION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2016. SHORTLY AFTER THIS PROCEDURE SHE SAT DOWN HARD ON A SEAT THAT WAS LOWER THAN EXPECTED AND NOTICED PAIN AND A LOUD SNAPPING/CRACKING SENSATION. EVALUATION INCLUDED RADIOGRAPHS WHICH NOTED ROD-TO-ROD CONNECTOR HAD FRACTURED. ON (B)(6) 2016 SHE HAD A REVISION SURGERY TO REMOVE AND REPLACE THE FRACTURED DEVICE.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Fall; Pain
MAUDE report 6316176 ↗
Other Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease devices
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721000Medos International Sàrl · Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease387 reports
- Sequoia® 3301-1Zimmer Spine, Inc. · Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease184 reports
- CD HORIZON® Spinal System 8590855Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease179 reports
- Vitality® 07.02011.001Biomet Spine LLC · Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease3 recalls0 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721001SMedos International Sàrl · Thoracolumbosacral pedicle screw system124 reports
- LineSider LS-N6SA7550Integrity Implants Inc. · Thoracolumbosacral Pedicle Screw System2 recalls1 report
- LineSider LS-N6SA6545Integrity Implants Inc. · Thoracolumbosacral Pedicle Screw System2 recalls0 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721000SMedos International Sàrl · Thoracolumbosacral pedicle screw system97 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page