ReLine 16025540Recalls & reported problems
Nuvasive, Inc. · RELINE MAS Red Screw, 5.5x40mm Poly 2C · Class 2 · Implant
All models of ReLine (129)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00887517556264), received between Mar 25, 2019 and May 4, 2021 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
Patient problems
- Cardiac Arrest1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 4, 2021Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
A PATIENT UNDERWENT A POSTERIOR FIXATION PROCEDURE AT TH10-L4. THE PATIENT WAS ASYMPTOMATIC AND IT WAS DISCOVERED DURING A ROUTINE FOLLOW UP THAT ONE OF THE IMPLANTED PEDICLE SCREWS HAD BECOME LOOSE. ON (B)(6) 2021, A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED TO ADDRESS THE LOOSENED PEDICLE SCREW AT L2. IN THE REVISION SURGERY, PEDICLE SCREWS FROM L2 TO L4 WERE REPLACED WITH NEW ONES AND NEW PEDICLE SCREWS WERE ADDED AT L5.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11773336 ↗InjuryMar 25, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2019, PATIENT UNDERWENT A POSTERIOR SPINAL FUSION FROM TH9-ILIAC LEVELS. AS PER REPORTER WHEN ATTEMPTING TO PLACE A ROD, PATIENT WENT INTO CARDIAC ARREST. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT PLACING A ROD. ON (B)(6) 2019, AN ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED, AND RODS WERE PLACED. NO ALLEGATION OF PRODUCT MALFUNCTION REPORTED.
Patient problems: Cardiac Arrest
MAUDE report 8448657 ↗
Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL devices
- EXPEDIUM 179702000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL439 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721001Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL227 reports
- XIA 3 48230000Stryker Corporation · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL193 reports
- VIPER 186715000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL1 death167 reports
- NA 04.614.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL80 reports
- EXPEDIUM VIPER 196789480Depuy Spine, LLC · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- NA 04.615.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- Arsenal Deformity Spinal Fixation System 47127Alphatec Spine, Inc. · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL66 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page