Skip to content

ReLine 16027545Recalls & reported problems

Nuvasive, Inc. · RELINE MAS Red Screw, 7.5x45mm Poly 2C · Class 2 · Implant

All models of ReLine (129)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00887517556998), received between Sep 1, 2021 and Sep 3, 2024 — classified as 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (6 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 4 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520264
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Migration6
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth4
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • Arthritis4
  • Tissue Breakdown4
  • Pain2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration

    (B)(6) 2024: PROCEDURE WHERE TH12, L2, L5, S1 WERE FIXATED BY PPS. (B)(6) 2024: PEDICLE SCREWS WERE FOUND TO HAVE BACKED OUT AT L5 AND S1 ON BOTH SIDES. (B)(6) 2024: REVISION SURGERY. PEDICLE SCREWS AT L5 WERE REPLACED WITH 8.5X45MM, S1 WITH 8.5X45 AND S2 WITH 8.5X70, FIXATED WITH 6.0TI RODS. (3 OF 4) S1 LEFT.

    Patient problems: Arthritis; Tissue Breakdown

    MAUDE report 20131717 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration

    (B)(6) 2024: PROCEDURE WHERE TH12, L2, L5, S1 WERE FIXATED BY PPS. (B)(6) 2024: PEDICLE SCREWS WERE FOUND TO HAVE BACKED OUT AT L5 AND S1 ON BOTH SIDES. (B)(6) 2024: REVISION SURGERY. PEDICLE SCREWS AT L5 WERE REPLACED WITH 8.5X45MM, S1 WITH 8.5X45 AND S2 WITH 8.5X70, FIXATED WITH 6.0TI RODS. (4 OF 4) S1 RT.

    Patient problems: Arthritis; Tissue Breakdown

    MAUDE report 20131715 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration

    (B)(6) 2024: PROCEDURE WHERE TH12, L2, L5, S1 WERE FIXATED BY PPS. (B)(6) 2024: PEDICLE SCREWS WERE FOUND TO HAVE BACKED OUT AT L5 AND S1 ON BOTH SIDES. (B)(6) 2024: REVISION SURGERY. PEDICLE SCREWS AT L5 WERE REPLACED WITH 8.5X45MM, S1 WITH 8.5X45 AND S2 WITH 8.5X70, FIXATED WITH 6.0TI RODS. (2 OF 4) L5 LEFT.

    Patient problems: Arthritis; Tissue Breakdown

    MAUDE report 20131556 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration

    (B)(6) 2024: PROCEDURE WHERE TH12, L2, L5, S1 WERE FIXATED BY PPS. (B)(6) 2024: PEDICLE SCREWS WERE FOUND TO HAVE BACKED OUT AT L5 AND S1 ON BOTH SIDES. (B)(6) 2024: REVISION SURGERY. PEDICLE SCREWS AT L5 WERE REPLACED WITH 8.5X45MM, S1 WITH 8.5X45 AND S2 WITH 8.5X70, RE-FIXATED WITH 6.0TI RODS.

    Patient problems: Arthritis; Tissue Breakdown

    MAUDE report 20131237 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 10, 2022Fracture; Fracture

    ACCORDING TO A CLINICAL STUDY, ON (B)(6) 2021 AN ANTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WAS PERFORMED AT L4/S1. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE POSTOPERATIVE RADIOGRAPHS REVEALED A RETAINED SCREW EXTENSION TAB AT LEFT S1. ON (B)(6) 2021 THE SCREW EXTENSION TAB WAS REPORTEDLY REMOVED. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13214071 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 1, 2021Migration; Migration

    ON (B)(6) 2021 A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CORPECTOMY THE FIRST OF A TWO-PART PROCEDURE AT T12. ON (B)(6) 2021 THE SECOND PART POSTERIOR FIXATION AT T10/L2 WAS COMPLETED. ON (B)(6) 2021 THE PATIENT REPORTED PAIN AND RADIOGRAPHS REVEALED SUBSIDENCE AT T12 AND FOUR SCREWS AT L1 AND L2 BACKED OUT. ON (B)(6) 2021 A REVISION SURGERY WAS CONDUCTED WHERE THE FOUR SCREWS AT L1/2 WERE REPLACED AND THE CONSTRUCT WAS EXTENDED TO T10/L4.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 12411328 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 1, 2021Migration; Migration

    ON (B)(6) 2021 A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CORPECTOMY THE FIRST OF A TWO-PART PROCEDURE AT T12. ON (B)(6) 2021 THE SECOND PART POSTERIOR FIXATION AT T10/L2 WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT ISSUE. ON (B)(6) 2021 THE PATIENT REPORTED PAIN AND RADIOGRAPHS REVEALED SUBSIDENCE AT T12 AND FOUR SCREWS AT L1 AND L2 BACKED OUT. ON (B)(6) 2021 A REVISION SURGERY WAS CONDUCTED WHERE THE FOUR SCREWS AT L1/2 WERE REPLACED AND THE CONSTRUCT WAS EXTENDED TO T10/L4.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 12411299 ↗

Other Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease devices

All Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page