ReLine 16027545Recalls & reported problems
Nuvasive, Inc. · RELINE MAS Red Screw, 7.5x45mm Poly 2C · Class 2 · Implant
All models of ReLine (129)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00887517556998), received between Sep 1, 2021 and Sep 3, 2024 — classified as 7 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Migration6
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth4
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- Arthritis4
- Tissue Breakdown4
- Pain2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 3, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration
(B)(6) 2024: PROCEDURE WHERE TH12, L2, L5, S1 WERE FIXATED BY PPS. (B)(6) 2024: PEDICLE SCREWS WERE FOUND TO HAVE BACKED OUT AT L5 AND S1 ON BOTH SIDES. (B)(6) 2024: REVISION SURGERY. PEDICLE SCREWS AT L5 WERE REPLACED WITH 8.5X45MM, S1 WITH 8.5X45 AND S2 WITH 8.5X70, FIXATED WITH 6.0TI RODS. (3 OF 4) S1 LEFT.
Patient problems: Arthritis; Tissue Breakdown
MAUDE report 20131717 ↗MalfunctionSep 3, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration
(B)(6) 2024: PROCEDURE WHERE TH12, L2, L5, S1 WERE FIXATED BY PPS. (B)(6) 2024: PEDICLE SCREWS WERE FOUND TO HAVE BACKED OUT AT L5 AND S1 ON BOTH SIDES. (B)(6) 2024: REVISION SURGERY. PEDICLE SCREWS AT L5 WERE REPLACED WITH 8.5X45MM, S1 WITH 8.5X45 AND S2 WITH 8.5X70, FIXATED WITH 6.0TI RODS. (4 OF 4) S1 RT.
Patient problems: Arthritis; Tissue Breakdown
MAUDE report 20131715 ↗MalfunctionSep 3, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration
(B)(6) 2024: PROCEDURE WHERE TH12, L2, L5, S1 WERE FIXATED BY PPS. (B)(6) 2024: PEDICLE SCREWS WERE FOUND TO HAVE BACKED OUT AT L5 AND S1 ON BOTH SIDES. (B)(6) 2024: REVISION SURGERY. PEDICLE SCREWS AT L5 WERE REPLACED WITH 8.5X45MM, S1 WITH 8.5X45 AND S2 WITH 8.5X70, FIXATED WITH 6.0TI RODS. (2 OF 4) L5 LEFT.
Patient problems: Arthritis; Tissue Breakdown
MAUDE report 20131556 ↗MalfunctionSep 3, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration
(B)(6) 2024: PROCEDURE WHERE TH12, L2, L5, S1 WERE FIXATED BY PPS. (B)(6) 2024: PEDICLE SCREWS WERE FOUND TO HAVE BACKED OUT AT L5 AND S1 ON BOTH SIDES. (B)(6) 2024: REVISION SURGERY. PEDICLE SCREWS AT L5 WERE REPLACED WITH 8.5X45MM, S1 WITH 8.5X45 AND S2 WITH 8.5X70, RE-FIXATED WITH 6.0TI RODS.
Patient problems: Arthritis; Tissue Breakdown
MAUDE report 20131237 ↗MalfunctionJan 10, 2022Fracture; Fracture
ACCORDING TO A CLINICAL STUDY, ON (B)(6) 2021 AN ANTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WAS PERFORMED AT L4/S1. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE POSTOPERATIVE RADIOGRAPHS REVEALED A RETAINED SCREW EXTENSION TAB AT LEFT S1. ON (B)(6) 2021 THE SCREW EXTENSION TAB WAS REPORTEDLY REMOVED. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13214071 ↗MalfunctionSep 1, 2021Migration; Migration
ON (B)(6) 2021 A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CORPECTOMY THE FIRST OF A TWO-PART PROCEDURE AT T12. ON (B)(6) 2021 THE SECOND PART POSTERIOR FIXATION AT T10/L2 WAS COMPLETED. ON (B)(6) 2021 THE PATIENT REPORTED PAIN AND RADIOGRAPHS REVEALED SUBSIDENCE AT T12 AND FOUR SCREWS AT L1 AND L2 BACKED OUT. ON (B)(6) 2021 A REVISION SURGERY WAS CONDUCTED WHERE THE FOUR SCREWS AT L1/2 WERE REPLACED AND THE CONSTRUCT WAS EXTENDED TO T10/L4.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 12411328 ↗MalfunctionSep 1, 2021Migration; Migration
ON (B)(6) 2021 A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CORPECTOMY THE FIRST OF A TWO-PART PROCEDURE AT T12. ON (B)(6) 2021 THE SECOND PART POSTERIOR FIXATION AT T10/L2 WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT ISSUE. ON (B)(6) 2021 THE PATIENT REPORTED PAIN AND RADIOGRAPHS REVEALED SUBSIDENCE AT T12 AND FOUR SCREWS AT L1 AND L2 BACKED OUT. ON (B)(6) 2021 A REVISION SURGERY WAS CONDUCTED WHERE THE FOUR SCREWS AT L1/2 WERE REPLACED AND THE CONSTRUCT WAS EXTENDED TO T10/L4.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 12411299 ↗
Other Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease devices
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721000Medos International Sàrl · Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease387 reports
- Sequoia® 3301-1Zimmer Spine, Inc. · Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease184 reports
- CD HORIZON® Spinal System 8590855Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease179 reports
- Vitality® 07.02011.001Biomet Spine LLC · Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease3 recalls0 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721001SMedos International Sàrl · Thoracolumbosacral pedicle screw system124 reports
- LineSider LS-N6SA7550Integrity Implants Inc. · Thoracolumbosacral Pedicle Screw System2 recalls1 report
- LineSider LS-N6SA6545Integrity Implants Inc. · Thoracolumbosacral Pedicle Screw System2 recalls0 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721000SMedos International Sàrl · Thoracolumbosacral pedicle screw system97 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page