Modulus 1181050P2Recalls & reported problems
Nuvasive, Inc. · Modulus XL, 10x18x50mm 10° · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Modulus (41)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00887517725882), received between Apr 11, 2024 and Jan 7, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Migration1
- Migration or Expulsion of Device1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 7, 2026Migration or Expulsion of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT L2/L5 LATERAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION AND INSERTED CAGES FOR EACH INTERVERTEBRAL SPACES. AFTER CONFIRMING THE POSITION OF THE L4/5 CAGE WITH A C-ARM, THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO ADJUST ITS PLACEMENT. HOWEVER, IT WAS DIFFICULT TO GRASP THE CAGE WITH THE INSERTER. THE SURGEON TRIED TO REMOVE THE CAGE USING INSTRUMENTS E.G. FORCEPS BUT THE CAGE WAS PUSHED FURTHER TOWARD THE OPPOSITE SIDE. ULTIMATELY, THE CAGE WAS DISLODGED FROM THE INTERVERTEBRAL SPACE AND MIGRATED TO THE VENTRAL ASPECT OF THE L5/SACRUM. DUE TO THE PATIENT'S POSTURE DURING THE SURGERY, THE DISLODGED IMPLANT COULD NOT BE REMOVED. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO LEAVE THE CAGE IN-SITU AS THERE WAS A LOW RISK OF DAMAGING THE SURROUNDING VESSELS BECAUSE OF NO SPIKE ON THE CAGE SURFACE. AND NEW SPINAL CAGE WAS INSERTED INTO L4/5, AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED. THE SURGEON COMMENTED THAT THE PATIENT'S L5 VERTEBRA WAS IRREGULARLY SHAPED, WHICH INTERFERED WITH THE SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS AND MADE GRASPING THE CAGE DIFFICULT. THE DROPPED CAGE WAS REMOVED BY LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025. WE DO NOT RECEIVE ANY OTHER ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 23988704 ↗MalfunctionApr 11, 2024Migration; Migration
ON (B)(6) 2024 AN EXTREME LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION WAS PERFORMED AT L3/4. ON (B)(6) 2024 IT WAS DISCOVERED THE INTERBODY BACKED OUT. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED. NO REVISION SURGERY IS PLANNED. THE PATIENT IS UNDER OBSERVATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19092494 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, thoracic devices
- Modulus 1775850Nuvasive, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, thoracic37 reports
- Modulus 1225255P2Nuvasive, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, thoracic2 reports
- CoRoent 6130923P2Nuvasive, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, thoracic2 reports
- Cohere 6120308P2Nuvasive, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, thoracic2 reports
- Modulus 1181055P2Nuvasive, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, thoracic2 reports
- TLX 5902826P2Nuvasive, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, thoracic1 report
- CoRoent 5281348P2Nuvasive, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, thoracic1 report
- IDENTITI 100-06185510-SAlphatec Spine, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, thoracic1 report
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page