Skip to content

Modulus 1181050P2Recalls & reported problems

Nuvasive, Inc. · Modulus XL, 10x18x50mm 10° · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Modulus (41)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00887517725882), received between Apr 11, 2024 and Jan 7, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Migration1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 7, 2026Migration or Expulsion of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT L2/L5 LATERAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION AND INSERTED CAGES FOR EACH INTERVERTEBRAL SPACES. AFTER CONFIRMING THE POSITION OF THE L4/5 CAGE WITH A C-ARM, THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO ADJUST ITS PLACEMENT. HOWEVER, IT WAS DIFFICULT TO GRASP THE CAGE WITH THE INSERTER. THE SURGEON TRIED TO REMOVE THE CAGE USING INSTRUMENTS E.G. FORCEPS BUT THE CAGE WAS PUSHED FURTHER TOWARD THE OPPOSITE SIDE. ULTIMATELY, THE CAGE WAS DISLODGED FROM THE INTERVERTEBRAL SPACE AND MIGRATED TO THE VENTRAL ASPECT OF THE L5/SACRUM. DUE TO THE PATIENT'S POSTURE DURING THE SURGERY, THE DISLODGED IMPLANT COULD NOT BE REMOVED. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO LEAVE THE CAGE IN-SITU AS THERE WAS A LOW RISK OF DAMAGING THE SURROUNDING VESSELS BECAUSE OF NO SPIKE ON THE CAGE SURFACE. AND NEW SPINAL CAGE WAS INSERTED INTO L4/5, AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED. THE SURGEON COMMENTED THAT THE PATIENT'S L5 VERTEBRA WAS IRREGULARLY SHAPED, WHICH INTERFERED WITH THE SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS AND MADE GRASPING THE CAGE DIFFICULT. THE DROPPED CAGE WAS REMOVED BY LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025. WE DO NOT RECEIVE ANY OTHER ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 23988704 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 11, 2024Migration; Migration

    ON (B)(6) 2024 AN EXTREME LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION WAS PERFORMED AT L3/4. ON (B)(6) 2024 IT WAS DISCOVERED THE INTERBODY BACKED OUT. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED. NO REVISION SURGERY IS PLANNED. THE PATIENT IS UNDER OBSERVATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19092494 ↗

Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, thoracic devices

All Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, thoracic devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page