Skip to content

Brasseler USA 5003989M0Recalls & reported problems

Peter Brasseler Holdings, LLC · KM3-111 25.0 X 9.0MM · Class 1

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00887919445869), received between Dec 9, 2024 and Mar 26, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 26, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE DOCTOR WAS USING THE BLADE FOR AN ACL REPAIR SURGERY, CUTTING TIBIA AND PATELLA FOR BTB AUTOGRAFT. THE BLADE BROKE AT THE HUB. THEY CONTINUED TO USE THE SAME PART NUMBER, AND THE OTHER BLADES BROKE AS WELL DURING THIS PROCEDURE. THE REPORTED NUMBER OF BLADES BROKEN VARIED FROM FOUR TO FIVE. THESE BLADES, AND THEIR PACKAGING, WERE DISCARDED. THERE WAS NO INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21699964 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 9, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    DURING AN ACL REPAIR, THE BLADE BROKE WHEN TRYING TO CUT THE PATELLA. IT BROKE AT THE BASE OF THE BLADE WHERE THE BLADE ATTACHES TO THE POWER SYSTEM. THE PRODUCT WAS COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20887735 ↗

Other BLADE, SAW, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY, SURGICAL devices

All BLADE, SAW, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY, SURGICAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page