Arthrex® ABS-1001Recalls & reported problems
Arthrex, Inc. · NEEDLE, TUOHY WITH OBTURATOR · Class 1
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867001817), received between Jul 1, 2020 and Mar 11, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Contamination” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Contamination2
- Defective Device1
- Device Fell1
- Material Fragmentation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- Exposure to Body Fluids1
- Foreign Body In Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 11, 2026Contamination
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN AUTO CART (MINCED CARTILAGE) KNEE SURGERY IT WAS NOTICED THAT FOREIGN MATERIAL IS PRESENT IN THE COLLECTED CARTILAGE MATERIAL AFTER IT HAS BEEN INTRODUCED INTO THE INSERTION SLEEVE (NEEDLE, TUOHY). PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION RECEIVED. WITH CASE (B)(4) INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED THAT THE SAME ERROR OCCURRED PREVIOUSLY WITH NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE, THEREFORE THIS CASE WAS CREATED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24567679 ↗MalfunctionMar 11, 2026Contamination
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN AUTO CART (MINCED CARTILAGE) KNEE SURGERY IT WAS NOTICED THAT FOREIGN MATERIAL IS PRESENT IN THE COLLECTED CARTILAGE MATERIAL AFTER IT HAS BEEN INTRODUCED INTO THE INSERTION SLEEVE (NEEDLE, TUOHY). PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH THE SAME DEVICE. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24567181 ↗MalfunctionOct 25, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING AN AUTOCART PROCEDURE, METAL DEBRIS WAS FOUND IN THE HARVESTED CARTILAGE MASS. THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY REPORTED. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH THE SAME DEVICE. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY. 09-OCT-2023 UPDATE DW: FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED THAT AFTER THE CARTILAGE IS CUT WITH THE SABRE AR-7300SR AND COLLECTED WITH THE GRAFTNET IT WAS NOTICED THAT NO METAL PARTICLES WERE FOUND IN THE CARTILAGE MASS AT THIS MOMENT. THE METAL ABRASION ONLY BECAME VISIBLE IN THE JOINT WHEN THE CARTILAGE MASS WAS APPLIED, INDICATING THAT THE DEBRIS WAS CAUSED BY THE SYRINGE. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO USE THE MASS WITH THE PARTICLES TO FINISH THE SURGERY SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 18001813 ↗InjuryFeb 7, 2022Defective Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN AUTOCART PROCEDURE NO THROMBIN WAS PRODUCED. THE MIXTURE COULD NOT BE PRODUCED BECAUSE THE THROMBIN COULD NOT BE DRAWN FROM THE FILTER. THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE WAS CHANGED TO A PRIDIE DRILLING. BUT THE SURGERY COULD NOT BE FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY. A SECOND SURGERY WILL BE NECESSARY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13471864 ↗InjuryJul 1, 2020Device Fell
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SECOND SYRINGE DROPPED OUT OF THE DOUBLE SYRINGE WITHOUT ANY TWISTING OR PRESSURE FOLLOWING A BLOOD DRAW, RESULTING IN SPILLAGE OF SPECIMEN FLUID. NO FURTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED. FURTHER INFORMATION REQUESTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OBTAINED 6/16/2020: PROCEDURE WAS A BLOOD DRAW AND PRP INJECTION. THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED IN THE SURGEON'S OFFICE. THE SPILLAGE OF SPECIMEN FLUID WAS CLEANED WITH SANI-WIPES AND DISINFECTANT. THE SPECIMEN FLUID CAME IN CONTACT WITH THE MID-LEVEL PROVIDER WHO WAS USING THE DEVICE, ONLY ON CLOTHING AND ARMS. PROVIDER WAS WEARING GLOVES/PPE. THE FACILITY HAS PROVIDED A LOT NUMBER (930598580) WHICH DOES NOT MATCH THE PART NUMBER PROVIDED (ABS-1001) WITH THE ORIGINAL REPORT. IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE CORRECT PART NUMBER IS ABS-10011.
Patient problems: Exposure to Body Fluids
MAUDE report 10217837 ↗
Other Accessories, arthroscopic devices
- Arthrex® AR-12990Arthrex, Inc. · Accessories, arthroscopic409 reports
- NA 228302Medos International Sàrl · ACCESSORIES,ARTHROSCOPIC287 reports
- FIRSTPASS 72290128Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ACCESSORIES,ARTHROSCOPIC232 reports
- NA 251723Medos International Sàrl · ACCESSORIES,ARTHROSCOPIC145 reports
- COBRA 3910900093Stryker Corporation · Accessories, arthroscopic138 reports
- FirstPass 72290129Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Accessories, arthroscopic82 reports
- FirstPass 72290130Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Accessories, arthroscopic80 reports
- MITEK 242025Medos International Sàrl · ACCESSORIES,ARTHROSCOPIC61 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page