Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-1204AF-120Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · 12.0 MM FLIP CUTTER II · Class 1

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867004153), received between Jun 14, 2019 and May 20, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 20, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    ON 03/04/2022, IT WAS REPORTED BY A DISTRIBUTOR VIA SEMS THAT A AR-1204AF-120 FLIPCUTTER PACKAGING WAS DAMAGED, AND DECLARED UNSUITABLE FOR THEIR SHELF. THIS WAS DISCOVERED UPON RECEIVING, WITH NO PATIENT EFFECT REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19351048 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 6, 2021Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF THE FLIPCUTTER BROKE OFF AS SOON AS DRILLING BEGAN ON THE CORTICAL SURFACE OF THE FEMUR. THE TIP WAS RETRIEVED AND THE CASE WAS COMPLETED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12124302 ↗
  • InjuryJan 26, 2021Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2020 THE SURGEON WAS PERFORMING A RIGHT KNEE POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT AND POSTERIOR LATERAL CORNER RECONSTRUCTION. INTRA-OPERATIVELY THE TIBIAL AND FEMORAL BONE SOCKETS WERE REAMED WITH AN AR-1204AF-120, 12MM FLIPCUTTER II (LOT 816684176). TO LENGTHS OF 40MM AND 35 MM RESPECTIVELY. THE BLADE WAS CHANGED FROM CUTTING ORIENTATION BACK TO DRILLING ORIENTATION INSIDE THE FEMORAL SOCKET WITHOUT VISUAL OBSERVATION. THE GRAFT WAS PASSED, TENSIONED AND FIXATED WITH BUTTON. THIS WAS ALL COMPLETED WITHOUT ANY TEAM MEMBERS NOTICING ANY ISSUE. SURGEON TOOK A POST OPERATIVE RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE AFTER THE STERILE DRESSINGS WERE PLACED AND DISCOVERED A RETAINED BROKEN BLADE FROM THE FLIPCUTTER II. THE PATIENT HAD UNDERGONE A LENGTHY SURGERY WITH MAXIMUM TOURNIQUET TIME AND SURGEON MADE THE DECISION TO BRING PATIENT BACK AT A LATER DATE TO ARTHROSCOPICALLY REMOVE THE RETAINED FRAGMENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1/6/2020: PROCEDURE SCHEDULED FOR (B)(6) 2020 TO REMOVE THE RETAINED FRAGMENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1/11/2021: IT HAS BEEN CONFIRMED THAT THE FLIPCUTTER II FRAGMENT WAS ARTHROSCOPICALLY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT ON (B)(6) 2021. THE FLIPCUTTER II AND FRAGMENT AR

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 11228593 ↗
  • InjuryJun 14, 2019Break; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS INITIALLY REPORTED THAT DURING A REVISION ACL RECONSTRUCTION WITH ACHILLES-CALCANEUS ALLOGRAFT THE ARTHREX FLIPCUTTER II BROKE AT THE BEGINNING OF DRILLING THE TIBIAL SOCKET. SURGEONS WERE ABLE TO REMOVE THE BROKEN BLADE WHICH WAS NEAR THE TIBIAL TUNNEL. THIS WAS REPORTED TO BE A COMPLEX ACL REVISION CASE WITH PROMINENT DEFICIENCY OF THE BONE IN THE TIBIA. FOR THIS REASON THE SURGEON CHOSE TO USE THE LARGEST FLIPCUTTER II (12.0 MM) IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE THE LARGE BONE BLOCK. AFTER THE FLIPCUTTER BROKE, TO COMPLETE THIS PORTION OF THE PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON CHOSE TO USE ANOTHER MANUFACTURER¿S DEVICE. INSTEAD OF USING AN ALL-INSIDE TECHNIQUE, TO CREATE TWO SOCKETS IN THE TIBIA, THE SURGEON USED A CONVENTIONAL DRILL AND CREATED A FULL TIBIAL TUNNEL. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE SURGEON DID USE A FLIPCUTTER (10 MM) ON THE FEMUR WITH NO ISSUES. UPDATE 05-JUN-2019: THIS WAS CONFIRMED TO HAVE BEEN A REVISION CASE OF A PREVIOUS ACL RECONSTRUCTION WHICH WAS PERFORMED YEARS PRIOR. THE REPORTER HAS NO INFORMATION REGARDING THE PREVIOUS ACL RECONSTRUCTION AND THEREFORE IT CANNOT BE CONFIRMED IF THE ORIGINAL RECONSTRUCTION INVOLVED ANY ARTHREX PRODUCTS.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 8699708 ↗

Other INSTRUMENT, SURGICAL, ORTHOPEDIC, AC-POWERED MOTOR AND ACCESSORY/ATTACHMENT devices

All INSTRUMENT, SURGICAL, ORTHOPEDIC, AC-POWERED MOTOR AND ACCESSORY/ATTACHMENT devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page