Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-1204AF-75Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · 7.5 MM FLIP CUTTER II · Class 1

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867004238), received between Dec 21, 2021 and Mar 5, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Disconnection1
  • Material Integrity Problem1
  • Retraction Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 5, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ARTHROSCOPY PLUS OSTEOTOMY SURGERY AFTER INSERTION INTO THE TISSUE, THE DRILLING TIP OF THE RETROGRADE DRILL BROKE OFF. ALL FRAGMENTS WERE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY OCCURRED. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18839178 ↗
  • InjuryMay 30, 2023Retraction Problem; Retraction Problem

    ON (B)(6) 2023, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT A AR-1204AF-75 (7.5 MM FLIP CUTTER II) WAS UNABLE TO BE UN-FLIPPED AFTER IT HAS BEEN FLIPPED IN THE PATIENT'S KNEE. THIS OCCURRED DURING USE IN AN ACL PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2023. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO PATIENT HARM, AFTER REAMING FULL TIBIA TUNNEL INSTEAD OF RETROGRADE DRILLING.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17022970 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 9, 2022Disconnection; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ACL RECONSTRUCTION ALL-INSIDE SURGERY THE OUTSIDE PART OF THE FLIPCUTTER CAME OFF THE DEVICE DURING DRILLING. THE BROKEN PIECES WERE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH THE SAME DEVICE ANYWAY. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY. UPDATE 26-OCT-2022: FURTHER INFORMATION REVEALED THAT THE FLIPCUTTER HAS 2 PARTS: AN INSIDE WIRE AND AN OUTSIDE WIRE. THE OUTSIDE PART GOT LOOSE FROM THE INSIDE PART AT THE END OF THE BLUE PART AND IT SLID OFF.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15758810 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 21, 2021Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ALL-INSIDE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT ARTHROSCOPIC KNEE SURGERY THE TIP OF THE DEVICE BROKE OFF INSIDE THE PATIENT DURING DRILLING. NO BROKEN PARTS REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT. ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY OCCURRED. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13053876 ↗

Other INSTRUMENT, SURGICAL, ORTHOPEDIC, AC-POWERED MOTOR AND ACCESSORY/ATTACHMENT devices

All INSTRUMENT, SURGICAL, ORTHOPEDIC, AC-POWERED MOTOR AND ACCESSORY/ATTACHMENT devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page