Arthrex® AR-300SAGRecalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867100251), received between May 24, 2024 and Sep 18, 2026 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Connection Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• MalfunctionSep 18, 2026Overheating of Device

  On (b)(6) 2026, a Cetas Healthcare notification was received via email indicating that information from a clinical study had been obtained. The report stated that the healthcare professional (HCP) reported HCP reported that overheating of attachment or connected components was observed during usage. HCP also reported that it was a use-related or handling issue and same adverse event was experienced previously. No additional treatment was required to treat the adverse event. Device causality was assessed by the HCP as probably related to the device.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 50817093 ↗
• MalfunctionJan 5, 2026Physical Resistance/Sticking

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY THE HEAD JAMMED AND THE BLADE WAS STUCK IN THE ATTACHMENT. THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION RECEIVED.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 23960726 ↗
• MalfunctionMay 24, 2024Connection Problem; Connection Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY THE SAWBLADE CAME EASILY LOOSE IN THE DEVICE, BECAUSE THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH THE BUTTON OF THE DEVICE. NO PART OF THE DEVICE BROKE OFF. THERE WAS NO HARM OR ADVERSE EVENT FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY REPORTED. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH THE SAME DEVICE, BUT THE ERROR WAS DESCRIBED AS INCONVENIENT. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 19391465 ↗