Arthrex® AR-9100-12SRecalls & reported problems
Arthrex, Inc. · UNIVERS APEX HUMERAL STEM, 12MM · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867134706), received between Dec 16, 2019 and Sep 2, 2020 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loose or Intermittent Connection” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Loose or Intermittent Connection2
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
Patient problems
- Pain2
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Failure of Implant1
- Fall1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 2, 2020Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SURGICAL OUTCOME SYSTEM PATIENT (146155) HAD UNDERGONE A REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT SUFFERED A TRAUMATIC PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE REQUIRING AN EXCHANGE TO A LONG STEM. THE PATIENT HAD BEEN SEEN IN CLINIC (B)(6) 2020 FOR A RECENT FALL WITH NO GIVEN DATE. THE REVISION TO PERFORM THE EXCHANGE OOK PLACE (B)(6) 2020. A STANDARD OSTEOTOME WAS USED FOR REMOVAL OF HE AR-9100-12S UNIVERS APEX HUMERAL STEM, WHICH WAS LOOSE BECAUSE OF THE FRACTURE. THE DEVICE LOT NUMBER WAS NOT PROVIDED. THE PATIENT BONE QUALITY WAS REPORTED TO BE AVERAGE. THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS DURING REMOVAL.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Fall
MAUDE report 10482288 ↗InjuryMay 14, 2020Loose or Intermittent Connection
IT WAS REPORTED VIA THE SURGICAL OUTCOME SYSTEM THAT A PATIENT HAD PREVIOUS SHOULDER PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED LOOSENING OF THE IMPLANT ON THE HUMERAL SIDE THAT WAS UNRELATED TO ANY TRAUMA. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION TO A DIFFERENT TYPE OF ARTHROPLASTY. PATIENT IS ONGOING AND IMPROVING. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FROM THE SURGICAL OUTCOME SYSTEM. FURTHER INVESTIGATION IS IN PROCESS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OBTAINED 4/14/20: PATIENT UNDERWENT A RIGHT TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY AND OPEN BICEPS TENOSIS PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2016. PATIENT BEGAN EXPERIENCING PAIN ISSUES IN (B)(6) 2018. ON (B)(6) 2020 THE SAME SURGEON PERFORMED A REVISION PROCEDURE AT THE SAME FACILITY. THE REVISION PROCEDURE WAS AN OPEN SURGERY, REVISION TO REVERSE REPLACEMENT. EXPLANTED PART NUMBERS ARE NOT YET KNOWN. PATIENT STUDY ID IS (B)(6). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OBTAINED 4/22/20: THE FOLLOWING ARE THE IMPLANT PART NUMBERS FROM THE ORIGINAL (B)(6) 2016 PROCEDURE. ALL OF THE DEVICES LISTED WERE EXPLANTED DURING THE REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2020. THE DEVICE DISPOSITION IS UNKNOWN. AR-9106-03 UNIVERS VAULTLOCK GLENOID (LOT 1027261550}. AR-9150-19P UNIVERS II HUMERAL HEAD (LOT 150084918}. AR-
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 10055609 ↗InjuryDec 16, 2019Loose or Intermittent Connection
IT WAS REPORTED VIA THE SURGICAL OUTCOME SYSTEM THAT A PATIENT IN THE ARTHREX SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY STUDY HAD A RIGHT TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY PROCEDURE (B)(6) 2017. THE PATIENT WAS RECENTLY COMPLAINED OF PAIN AND WAS DIAGNOSED WITH LOOSENING OF THE HUMERAL PROSTHESIS. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE (B)(6) 2019 DURING WHICH ONLY THE HUMERAL COMPONENTS OF THE TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY WERE EXPLANTED. THE FOLLOWING ARTHREX DEVICES WERE EXPLANTED DURING THE 2019 PROCEDURE: AR-9156-22P HUMERAL HEAD (LOT 160084912) AND AR-9100-12S HUMERAL STEM (LOT 10064889). THE HUMERAL COMPONENTS WERE REPLACED WITH ANOTHER MANUFACTURERS PRODUCT. AT THIS TIME THE DISPOSITION OF THE EXPLANTED DEVICES IS UNKNOWN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OBTAINED 12/2/2019: FACILITY HAS CONFIRMED THAT THE DEVICE IS NO LONGER AVAILABLE TO RETURN FOR EVALUATION.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 9473272 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED devices
- DJO SURGICAL 508-32-204Encore Medical, L.P. · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED1 recall544 reports
- Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder 010000589Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED1 recall142 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130738203Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED175 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 509-00-432Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented1 recall117 reports
- Alliance® SBGL3007Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED162 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130760138Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED146 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130790030Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED132 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 509-00-436Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented124 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page