Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-9300DSRecalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · Dissector, 3.0mm x 7cm · Class 1

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867211834), received between Sep 21, 2021 and Sep 23, 2026 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Defective Device1
  • Dull, Blunt1
  • Material Fragmentation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 23, 2026Material Fragmentation

    It was reported that during an arthroscopic wrist surgery the device produced metal shaving while removing remnants of the SL ligament that prolapsed into the joint. The surgeon tried to remove the metal shaving, but he did not succeed. Some fragments remained in the patient's knee. The surgery was finished successfully with the same device. It was not necessary to switch the surgical technique or do a second surgery.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 50866746 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 9, 2026Break

    ON 16-FEB-2026, IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX SUBSIDIARY EMPLOYEE VIA (B)(4) THAT AN AR-9300DS DISSECTOR HAD THE MICRO TEETH BREAK. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A HAND ARTHROSCOPY PROCEDURE WITH NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24544088 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 24, 2024Defective Device; Defective Device

    ON 5TH JANUARY 2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX EMPLOYEE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-9300DS, DISSECTOR, SMALL HUB, 3.0 MM X 7 CM, HAD A MANUFACTURING PROBLEM. THIS WAS DETECTED DURING AN ARTHROSCOPIC ANKLE AND LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE ON (B)(4) 2024. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AS THE SURGEON DECIDED TO USE SABRE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18574318 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 21, 2021Break; Dull, Blunt

    IT WAS REPORTED ON (B)(6) 2021 BY A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE VIA SEMS THAT AN AR-9300DS DISSECTORS TEETH ARE DULLING AND METAL SHAVINGS ARE BREAKING OFF INSIDE THE PATIENT. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A CASE WITH NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12507564 ↗

Other BLADE, SAW, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY, SURGICAL devices

All BLADE, SAW, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY, SURGICAL devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.