Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-5400-18Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · SIZE 18 LEG, GLENOID TARGETER · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867315457), received between Oct 1, 2024 and Apr 21, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Accessory Incompatible” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Accessory Incompatible1
  • Defective Device1
  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 21, 2025Accessory Incompatible; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Accessory Incompatible; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A FRACTURE REVERSE SHOULDER REPLACEMENT WHEN ATTEMPTING TO BUILD THE VIP JIG THE SIZE 18 LEG TOO BIG TO FIT THE HOLE IN THE HANDLE. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21872384 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 26, 2025Defective Device; Defective Device

    ON 03/03/2025, A SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED VIA (B)(4) THAT AN AR-5400-02 VIP¿ GLENOID TARGETER HANDLE SLID EVEN THOUGH BOTH NUTS WERE SECURED TIGHTLY. AR-5400-04 VIP¿ GLENOID TARGETER LOCKING NUT, AND A SECOND NUT FROM THE AR-4500-S SET. THIS OCCURRED DURING A REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY ON (B)(6)2025. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON 03/04/2025 WHERE THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE STATED THE ARMS THAT DIDN¿T HOLD IN PLACE WERE 10,12,15,18,25. CLARIFICATION: IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TARGETER ARMS, AR-5400-10, AR-5400-12, AR-5400-15, AR-5400-18, AND AR-5400-25 WERE SLIDING ON THE HANDLE, DESPITE BOTH NUTS BEING SECURELY TIGHTENED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21696582 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 1, 2024Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    ON 09/19/2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA SEMS-06667505 THAT AN AR-5400-18 VIP¿ GLENOID TARGETER WAS BENT. THIS OCCURRED DURING A CASE WHERE THERE WAS NO EFFECT ON THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20346472 ↗

Other System, image processing, radiological devices

All System, image processing, radiological devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page