Skip to content

DJO SURGICAL 520-50-122Recalls & reported problems

Encore Medical, L.P. · HEAD, HUMERAL, OFFSET, 50-22 · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888912025065), received between Aug 12, 2017 and Jul 11, 2025 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Operates Differently Than Expected” (1 report).

4 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K080402); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
  • Patient-Device Incompatibility1
  • Torn Material1

Patient problems

  • Pain2
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Joint Dislocation1
  • Joint Laxity1
  • Loss of Range of Motion1
  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 11, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO IMPLANT FAILURE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 22487405 ↗
  • InjurySep 24, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO DISLOCATION.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 20297541 ↗
  • InjuryMar 30, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO LOOSENING.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 16652224 ↗
  • InjuryJan 11, 2018Device Operates Differently Than Expected

    REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO THE PATIENT FEELING PAIN AND NOT HAVING GOOD FUNCTION.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 7183517 ↗
  • InjuryDec 7, 2017Torn Material

    REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO A TORN ROTATOR CUFF. THE SURGEON REVISED THE PRIMARY SHOULDER TO A REVERSE SHOULDER. NO ISSUES WITH IMPLANT OR INSTRUMENTS.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 7097840 ↗
  • InjuryAug 12, 2017Patient-Device Incompatibility

    REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO THE PATIENT PRESENTING TO THE SURGEON WITH PAIN AND LOSS OF MOTION IN THE RIGHT SHOULDER. UPON INSPECTION AND X-RAYS, THE SURGEON DETERMINED THE PATIENT HAD A CUFF TEAR AND RECOMMENDED A REVERSE TOTAL SHOULDER TO REDUCE PAIN AND REGAIN RANGE OF MOTION. THE SURGEON PERFORMED THE SURGERY USING HIS STANDARD DELTO-PECTORAL INCISION TO GAIN ACCESS TO THE JOINT. ONCE THE IMPLANTS WERE EXPOSED HE REMOVED THE HEAD (520-50-122) AND HUMERAL NECK (520-00-000), THEN ASSESSED THE HUMERAL STEM AND REMOVED THE POLYETHYLENE GLENOID (520-01-250). HE THEN PROCEED TO IMPLANT A GLENOID BASEPLATE AND FOUR SCREWS. HE THEN TRIALED 3 HEADS AND THE TURON-TO-RSP CONVERSION SHELL TO DETERMINE THE FINAL IMPLANTS. ONCE COMFORTABLE WITH STABILITY AND RANGE-OF-MOTION THE SURGEON IMPLANTED THE GLENOID HEAD, TURON-TO-RSP CONVERSION SHELL AND THE POLYETHYLENE AND CLOSED.

    Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion; Pain

    MAUDE report 6790814 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K080402. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0800-2011 · Nov 5, 2010 · Terminated
    Turon Shoulder System Instrumentation, Turon Trial Pegged Glenoid, DJO Surgical
  • Z-0799-2011 · Nov 5, 2010 · Terminated
    Turon Shoulder System Instrumentation, Turon Trial Humeral Neck, DJO Surgical
  • Z-0801-2011 · Nov 5, 2010 · Terminated
    Turon Shoulder System Instrumentation, Turon Pegged Glenoid Drill Guide, REF 804-25-024, DJO Surgical
  • Z-0798-2011 · Nov 5, 2010 · Terminated
    Turon Shoulder System Instrumentation, Turon Humeral Head Trials, DJO Surgical

Other Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented devices

All Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page