Skip to content

DJO SURGICAL 521-01-246Recalls & reported problems

Encore Medical, L.P. · TURON PEGGED GLENOID, SZ 46MM, eplus · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
9
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888912145374), received between Aug 23, 2017 and Mar 2, 2026 — classified as 9 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available4
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Human-Device Interface Problem1
  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
  • Naturally Worn1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant4
  • Joint Laxity2
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Joint Dislocation1
  • No Code Available1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 2, 2026Naturally Worn

    REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO POLY WEAR.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 24477777 ↗
  • InjurySep 10, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO IMPLANT FAILURE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 20186472 ↗
  • InjuryDec 27, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO LOOSE GLENOID.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 16052244 ↗
  • InjuryNov 16, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO FAILED SUBSCAP.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12823908 ↗
  • InjuryAug 9, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO POST OPERATION SUB SCAP FAILURE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 12298419 ↗
  • InjuryJun 21, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO PATIENT HAVING INFECTION AND IMPLANTING REVERSE.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8722988 ↗
  • InjuryApr 27, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO THE PATIENT HAVING DISLOCATED.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; No Code Available

    MAUDE report 7469362 ↗
  • InjuryAug 23, 2017Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Human-Device Interface Problem

    REVISION SURGERY - THE SURGEON FOUND THE PATIENT NON-COMPLIANT WHICH CAUSED A FAILURE OF THE SUBSCAP/CUFF.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 6814997 ↗
  • InjuryAug 23, 2017Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO ALL OF THE PREVIOUS IMPLANTS HAVING TO BE REMOVED. THE PATIENT HAD A FAILED ROTATOR CUFF THAT HAD TO BE REVISED TO A REVERSE SHOULDER.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 6814591 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer + Additive, Cemented devices

All Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer + Additive, Cemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page