Skip to content

TRIGEN 71655136Recalls & reported problems

Smith & Nephew, Inc. · TRIGEN META TIBIAL NAIL 10MM X 36CM · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03596010585585), received between May 10, 2017 and Dec 5, 2023 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant2
  • Injury2
  • Pain2
  • Bone Fracture(s)1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 5, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, AFTER AN INTERNAL FIXATION SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PATIENT INDICATED THAT ON (B)(6) 2023 THE META-NAIL TIBIAL 10MM X 36CM THAT WAS IMPLANTED BROKE IN HALF CASING PAIN AND ANGULATION OF THE SITE. THE SURGEON WHO IMPLANTED THE DEVICE DRILLED HOLES IN IT TO SECURE IT WITH MORE HARDWARE, BUT IT STILL BROKE. ON (B)(6) 2023 A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED IN ORDER TO REPLACE THE BROKEN NAIL. THE CURRENT HEALTH STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS GOOD.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Failure of Implant; Pain

    MAUDE report 18267466 ↗
  • InjuryJun 5, 2019Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO A SUSPECTED INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 8670177 ↗
  • InjuryJun 5, 2019Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO NON UNION OF FRACTURE.

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 8670176 ↗
  • InjuryMay 10, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A NAIL WAS EXPLANTED. IMPLANTATION WAS DONE SEVERAL YEARS AGO WITH NO ISSUES. THE PATIENT WAS IN A CAR ACCIDENT RECENTLY AND DEVELOPED PAIN AROUND THE NAIL. SURGEON WOULD LIKE THE NAIL EXAMINED TO SEE IF IT SUSTAINED ANY DAMAGE FROM THE ACCIDENT WHICH LEAD TO THE PATIENT'S PAIN.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain

    MAUDE report 6556425 ↗

Other NAIL, FIXATION, BONE devices

All NAIL, FIXATION, BONE devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.