ARTHRO-PIERCE 72201186Recalls & reported problems
Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ARTHROPIERCE INSTRUMENT CURVED LEFT · Class 1
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03596010605610), received between Apr 5, 2018 and Jan 7, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break5
- Difficult to Open or Close1
- Material Deformation1
- Material Separation1
- Mechanical Jam1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Information2
- Foreign Body In Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 7, 2026Break; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ARTHROSCOPY, THE METAL PIECE OF ONE (1) ARTHROPIERCE INSTRUMENT BROKE WHEN IT PIERCED THROUGH THE ROTATOR CUFF. THE PIECE WAS REMOVED USING A GRASPER. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, AFTER A NON-SIGNIFICANT DELAY, USING A SIMILAR S+N BACK-UP PRODUCT. THE PATIENT STATUS IS FINE. ADDITIONAL ANESTHESIA WAS NOT REQUIRED AS CONSEQUENCE OF THE SURGICAL PROLONGATION. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23989258 ↗InjuryMay 4, 2022Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ARTHROSCOPY, THE ARTHROPIECE CLAMP WAS DAMAGED AT THE TIME OF PASSING THE POINTS OF THE SECOND SUTUREFIX ULTRA 1.9MM ANCHOR. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NON-SIGNIFICANT DELAY USING A BACK-UP DEVICE. THE TIP OF THE CLAMP REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT AND COULD NOT BE REMOVED. PATIENT CONDITION IS STABLE. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 14283742 ↗MalfunctionNov 1, 2020Difficult to Open or Close; Mechanical Jam; Difficult to Open or Close; Mechanical Jam
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING ARTHROSCOPY, THE ARTHROPIERCE INSTRUMENT'S GRABBING ARM STOPPED CLOSING IN MID PROCEDURE. THERE WAS A DELAY OF UNDER 30 MIN, THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A CHANGE IN TECHNIQUE USING A COMPETITOR DEVICE (MITEK CLEVERHOOK). NO PATIENT INJURY OR OTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHOULD BECOME AVAILABLE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED ACCORDINGLY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Information
MAUDE report 10767698 ↗InjuryOct 23, 2020Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SHOULDER ARTHROSCOPY, THE TIP OF THE ARTHROPIERCE INSTRUMENT CURVED LEFT BROKE WHEN IT WAS BEING PASSED THROUGH THE TISSUE. THE BROKEN TIP WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT WITH A GRASPER. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT DELAY USING A ARTHROPIERCE INSTRUMENT CURVED RIGHT. NO PATIENT INJURY OR OTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHOULD BECOME AVAILABLE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED ACCORDINGLY.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 10726923 ↗MalfunctionSep 2, 2020Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SHOULDER ARTHROSCOPY PROCEDURE, THE ARTHRO-PIERCE INSTRUMENT CURVED LEFT BROKE. HOWEVER, THERE WAS NO BREAKAGE INSIDE THE PATIENT. BACKUP DEVICE WAS AVAILABLE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. HOWEVER, NO DELAY AND NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHOULD BECOME AVAILABLE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED ACCORDINGLY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10483381 ↗MalfunctionFeb 3, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY THE ARTHROPIERCE BROKE. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THERE WAS ANY BACKUP DEVICE AVAILABLE; THEREFORE, IS UNKNOWN HOW THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. NO DELAY, PATIENT INJURIES OR OTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHOULD BECOME AVAILABLE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED ACCORDINGLY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9662544 ↗MalfunctionApr 5, 2018Break
IT WAS REPORTED DURING THE OPERATION, THE STITCHING PART OF THE INSTRUMENT WAS BROKEN. THE PROCEDURE AND TECHNIQUE WERE OBSERVED. THE FRAGMENT WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S SOFT TISSUES AND DISPOSED OF. NO PATIENT INJURIES WERE REPORTED. NO SAMPLE AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7399229 ↗
Other ACCESSORIES,ARTHROSCOPIC devices
- Arthrex® AR-12990Arthrex, Inc. · Accessories, arthroscopic409 reports
- NA 228302Medos International Sàrl · ACCESSORIES,ARTHROSCOPIC287 reports
- FIRSTPASS 72290128Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ACCESSORIES,ARTHROSCOPIC232 reports
- NA 251723Medos International Sàrl · ACCESSORIES,ARTHROSCOPIC145 reports
- COBRA 3910900093Stryker Corporation · Accessories, arthroscopic138 reports
- FirstPass 72290129Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Accessories, arthroscopic82 reports
- FirstPass 72290130Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Accessories, arthroscopic80 reports
- MITEK 242025Medos International Sàrl · ACCESSORIES,ARTHROSCOPIC61 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page