Skip to content

ARROW® 265147 - STD HUMERAL INSERT, Ø42 / H00Recalls & reported problems

Fournitures Hospitalieres Industrie · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 03661489651472), received between Jul 29, 2019 and Jul 29, 2019 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1

Patient problems

  • Discomfort1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 29, 2019Break; Break

    DR. (B)(6) NEEDED TO REVISE A SHOULDER PREVIOUSLY PERFORMED BY DR (B)(6). THE FIRST INTERVENTION TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2013. PT HAD SHOULDER DISCOMFORT AND INITIAL X-RAYS SHOWED A POSSIBLE LOOSENING OF HUMERAL INSERT. ONCE SURGERY WAS PERFORMED, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE MORSE TAPER PEG OF THE HUMERAL INSERT BECAME DETACHED FROM THE INSERT ITSELF AND REMAINED IN THE HUMERAL STEM, AND THE HUMERAL INSERT WAS VERY LOOSE. THE STEM, HUMERAL INSERT, GLENOSPHERE AND 1 SCREW WERE ALL SWAPPED OUT.

    Patient problems: Discomfort

    MAUDE report 8836447 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented devices

All Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page