611 - ANKLE FUSION NAIL LJU601Recalls & reported problems
Tornier · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03700386938276), received between Feb 20, 2019 and Oct 11, 2022 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Eject” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Failure to Eject1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- Implant Pain1
- No Information1
- Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 11, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A NAIL REMOVAL DUE TO JOINT FUSION DID NOT OCCUR, PERSISTENT PAIN IN THE PATIENT. DURING REMOVAL THE 2 ANTEROPOSTERIOR SCREWS BROKE. HALF OF THE SCREW REMAINED IN THE POSTERIOR PART OF THE CALCANEUS AS WELL AS IN THE LOCKING HOLE OF THE NAIL MAKING IT VERY COMPLICATED TO REMOVE THE NAIL. LENGTHENING OF MORE THAN 2 HOURS THE DURATION OF THE INTERVENTION. THE 2 PIECES OF SCREW COULD NOT BE REMOVED AND WERE THEREFORE LEFT IN THE PATIENT'S CALCANEUM. THE SURGEON WAS FORCED TO USE THE SLEDGEHAMMER TO AVOID A NEW POSTERIOR APPROACH, WHICH COULD HAVE FURTHER WEAKENED THE PATIENT'S CALCANEUS.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Implant Pain; Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture
MAUDE report 15584657 ↗MalfunctionFeb 20, 2019Failure to Eject; Failure to Eject
DURING A SURGERY IN ORDER TO REMOVE A NAIL AT THE ANKLE, THE SURGEON NOTICES THAT ONE OF THE SCREWS LOCKING THE NAIL SEEMS "WELDED". THE SURGEON WAS UNABLE TO PERFORM THE PLANNED OPERATION AND HAD TO PERFORM A TIBIA OSTEOTOMY REQUIRING AN ADDITIONAL SURGICAL APPROACH AS WELL AS AN INCREASED DURATION OF OPERATION.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 8354126 ↗
Other ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES devices
- NA 03.033.001Synthes GmbH · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES265 reports
- GAMMA 3125-1180SStryker GmbH · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES249 reports
- NA 03.037.026Synthes GmbH · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES225 reports
- PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSC5-075Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls2 reports
- PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSC5-045Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls1 report
- PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSC5-050Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls1 report
- TRIGEN 71674067Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES201 reports
- PRECICE Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSB5-040Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page