T'Lift® AW16280Recalls & reported problems
Peters Surgical · Single use, laparoscopic retraction system · Class 1
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 03700393301360), received between Feb 22, 2023 and Feb 22, 2023 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 22, 2023Fracture; Fracture
OPE TRIAGE PERSONNEL RECEIVED A CALL FROM DOCTOR CONCERNING A SURGERY HE PERFORMED WHILE USING A FAULTY PIECE OF EQUIPMENT. HE STATES THAT HE WAS USING A T'LIFT SINGE-USE LAPAROSCOPIC RETRACTION SYSTEM WHICH IS USED TO GO THROUGH THE ABDOMINAL WALL TO HOLD THE OVARY OUT OF THE WAY FOR SURGERY. DOCTOR SAYS IT DEPLOYS LIKE AN IUD AND WHEN HE USED IT, A PIECE OF THE EQUIPMENT WAS BROKEN OFF AND DISCHARGED INTO THE ABDOMEN. IT WAS ABOUT THE SIZE OF 3MM-1MM, AND IT WAS RECOGNIZED RIGHT AWAY. THEY SEARCHED FOR THE PIECE BUT WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE IT. SINCE THE DEVICE IS NOT RADIOPAQUE, THE SURGEON WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THIS PIECE AND WAS FORCED TO CLOSE WITH IT INSIDE. DOCTOR DISCLOSED THIS TO THE PATIENT'S RELATIVE RIGHT AFTER SURGERY BUT THE PATIENT WAS ASLEEP, AND PATIENT HAS NOT HAD A CONVERSATION WITH THEIR SIGNIFICANT OTHER. DOCTOR DID ANSWER ALL THE QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS THAT THE PATIENT'S SIGNIFICANT OTHER HAD AT THE TIME. THE OR MANAGER IS AWARE ACCORDING TO HIS STATEMENT. WHAT WAS THE ORIGINAL INTENDED PROCEDURE? : LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY. WHAT PROBLEM DID THE USER HAVE (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) :DEVICE MALFUNCTION - THAT IS, THE DEVICE DID NOT DO WHAT IT WAS SUPPOSED TO DO; DEVIC
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 16415838 ↗
Other Laparoscopic Accessories, Gynecologic devices
- Epix Laparoscopic Grasper C4130Applied Medical Resources Corporation · Laparoscopic Accessories, Gynecologic35 reports
- Direct Drive Reposable Graspers C4120Applied Medical Resources Corporation · Laparoscopic Accessories, Gynecologic28 reports
- Direct Drive Reposable Graspers C4121Applied Medical Resources Corporation · Laparoscopic Accessories, Gynecologic15 reports
- Epix Laparoscopic Grasper C4140Applied Medical Resources Corporation · Laparoscopic Accessories, Gynecologic5 reports
- Direct Drive Reposable Graspers C4119Applied Medical Resources Corporation · Laparoscopic Accessories, Gynecologic3 reports
- N/AStryker Sustainability Solutions, Inc. · Laparoscopic accessories, gynecologic2 reports
- Direct Drive Laparoscopic Grasping System C5223Applied Medical Resources Corporation · Laparoscopic Accessories, Gynecologic1 report
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page