Skip to content

Tornier Flex Shoulder System DWF601ARecalls & reported problems

Tornier · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Tornier Flex Shoulder System (91)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03700434021646), received between Mar 23, 2024 and Feb 26, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Material Erosion1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Erosion1
  • Fall1
  • Limb Fracture1
  • Osteopenia/ Osteoporosis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 26, 2025Material Erosion; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Material Erosion; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SHOULDER REPLACEMENT. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR REVISION PROCEDURES PERFORMED UNTIL FEBRUARY 2025. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE TO PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE AND NATIVE GLENOID SURFACE EROSION WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER. REVISION PROCEDURE TYPE: REVISION STEMMED TOTAL REVERSE ARTHROPLASTY.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Erosion

    MAUDE report 21469197 ↗
  • InjurySep 24, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION OF HUMERAL COMPONENTS DUE TO PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE CAUSE BY PATIENT FALL. THE HUMERAL COMPONENTS WERE REMOVED, AND REPLACED WITH A AEQUALIS FLEX REVIVE STEM, THE FRACTURE REDUCED TO THIS REVISION STEM. NO ISSUE WITH IMPLANTS.

    Patient problems: Fall; Limb Fracture

    MAUDE report 20292508 ↗
  • InjuryMar 23, 2024Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    BONY RESORPTION ALONG THE GREATER TUBEROSITY AND AN ENLARGING EFFUSION AROUND THE PROXIMAL HUMERUS WERE OBSERVED. A REVISION SURGERY WAS CONDUCTED, REMOVING COMPONENTS SUCH AS THE TRAY, STEM, GLENOSPHERE, AND INSERT. THE RELATEDNESS TO THE STUDY DEVICE WAS DEFINITE, WHILE ITS RELATION TO THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE WAS CONSIDERED POSSIBLE.

    Patient problems: Osteopenia/ Osteoporosis

    MAUDE report 18965266 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page