Skip to content

Easytech Anatomical Shoulder System 314-0030Recalls & reported problems

Fx Solutions · EASYTECH ANCHOR BASE TA6V Ø30 mm CEMENTLESS Ti/HA · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Easytech Anatomical Shoulder System (4)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03701037301463), received between Dec 3, 2021 and Feb 1, 2022 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Output Problem1

Patient problems

  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Joint Dislocation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 1, 2022Output Problem

    PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2021 DUE TO A DISMANTLING, APPROXIMATELY 5 YEARS AFTER THE FIRST SURGERY. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED CENTERED HEAD, DOUBLE TAPER, ANCHOR BASE AND 2 PEGS GLENOID. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED POST EXTENSION, 135/145° Ø36+3 CUP, TWO STANDARD SCREW, LOCKING SCREW, CENTERED GLENOSPHERE AND GLENOID BASEPLATE.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 13410825 ↗
  • InjuryDec 27, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2021 DUE TO DISLOCATION, APPROXYMATELY 7 DAYS AFTER THE FIRST SURGERY. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED 36+3 CUP AND ANCHOR BASE. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED HUMERIS STEM AND 135/145° Ø36+6 CUP.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 13086897 ↗
  • InjuryDec 16, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2021 DUE TO DISLOCATION. APPROXIMATELY 13 DAYS AFTER THE FIRST SURGERY. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED HUMERAL CUP Ø 36+3 AND ANCHOR BASE. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED HUMERIS STEM SIZE 12 AND HUMERAL CUP 135-145 Ø 36+3.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 13017620 ↗
  • InjuryDec 3, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2021 DUE TO A CUFF TEAR, APPROXIMATELY 2 YEARS AFTER THE FIRST SURGERY. SURGEON EXPLANTED DOUBLE TAPER, EXCENTRED HEAD AND ANCHOR BASE. SURGEON IMPLANTED STANDARD SCREW, CENTERED GLENOSPHERE, STEM TA6V Ø36/08, TWO CORTICAL SCREW, POST EXTENSION, HUMERAL CUP 36+9 AND GLENOID BASEPLATE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 12922648 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Total Anatomic Shoulder, Uncemented Metaphyseal Humeral Stem With No Diaphyseal Incursion, Semi-Constrained devices

All Prosthesis, Total Anatomic Shoulder, Uncemented Metaphyseal Humeral Stem With No Diaphyseal Incursion, Semi-Constrained devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page